Top 25
1-3-1
- Games
- 5
- Win rate
- 30.0%
Back to Coaches
Consistent WinnerBalanced
Coach Profile
Ray George
1951-1953 • Texas A&M
One defining program at Texas A&M.
Ray George coached 3 seasons, won 46.7%, and posted an average SRS of 9.5. Best season: 1951 Texas A&M. The profile was balanced with a very steady week-to-week shape. One primary stint defined the run.
- Career record
- 12-14-4
- Career win rate
- 46.7%
- Average SRS
- 9.5
- Peak SRS
- 14.3
Career Dossier
One glance at the full arc.
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
- Seasons coached
- 3
- Career span
- 3 years
- Best finish
- —
- Consistency
- 89.6
Primary school anchor
Texas A&M
Balanced profile with 1 program stop and a peak score of 71.8.
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Ray George
EliteStrongAverageLean
1951Actual season year • SRS range 6.8 to 14.31953
Active comparison point
Ray George • 1951
1951 Texas A&M
Best season5-3-2 • SRS 14.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
60.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Ranked opponent record
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 10
0-3
- Games
- 3
- Win rate
- 0.0%
Top 5
0-2
- Games
- 2
- Win rate
- 0.0%
Tenure map
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger stint
Texas A&M
1951-1953 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS 9.5 • Win % 46.7%
- Longest tenure
- Texas A&M • 3 seasons
- Best tenure
- Texas A&M • 9.5 SRS
- Best tenure win rate
- Texas A&M • 46.7%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Ray George
Insufficient sample
- Raw avg SP Overall
- —
- Percentile
- —
Insufficient sample
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Impact by school
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
Texas A&M
1951-1953 • 12-14-4
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS 9.5Win % 46.7%
Avg wins
Higher is better
4.0 during vs 3.0 baseline
+1.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
9.5 during vs 6.0 baseline
+3.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
Career highs and lows
High Points
Best Season
Texas A&M 1951
5-3-2 • SRS 14.3
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 1953
4-5-1 • -0.5 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Texas A&M 1953
4-5-1 • SRS 6.8
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 1952
3-6-1 • -7.0 SRS
Season-by-season results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Texas A&M | 1953 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 45.0% | — | — | 6.8 | — | — | — | -0.5 | +10.0% |
| Texas A&M | 1952 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 35.0% | — | — | 7.3 | — | — | — | -7.0 | -25.0% |
| Texas A&M | 1951 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60.0% | #6 | — | 14.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
Similar coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
Jack Chevigny
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 9.2 • Peak SRS 13.5 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.0
Open profile →Chalmer Woodward
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 10.2 • Peak SRS 13.1 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.5
Open profile →Paul Dashiell
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS 9.8 • Peak SRS 13.4 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 4.7
Open profile →Gar Davidson
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 9.4 • Peak SRS 12.0 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 2.5
Open profile →Jack Christiansen
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS 8.6 • Peak SRS 12.7 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.6
Open profile →Doug Barfield
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS 8.2 • Peak SRS 13.7 • 5 seasons
Best finish #16 • Volatility 3.5
Open profile →