Top 25
3-6
- Games
- 9
- Win rate
- 33.3%
Coach Profile
2003-2009 • Louisville, Tulsa
2 schools coached, anchored by Tulsa.
Steve Kragthorpe coached 7 seasons, won 50.6%, and posted an average SRS of -3.2. Best season: 2007 Louisville. The profile was offense-first with a mostly steady profile. 2 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Tulsa
Offense-First profile with 2 program stops and a peak score of 47.3.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
6-6 • SRS 5.0 • SP Overall 12.1
Win %
50.0%
YoY SRS
+3.1
SP Off / Def
40.6 / 29.2
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
3-6
Top 10
0-2
Top 5
0-1
| 2009 Regular Week 8 | Louisville | Cincinnati | #5 | L10-41 |
| 2008 Regular Week 12 | Louisville | Cincinnati | #22 | L20-28 |
| 2008 Regular Week 11 | Louisville | Pittsburgh | #25 | L7-41 |
| 2008 Regular Week 9 | Louisville | South Florida | #14 | W24-20 |
| 2007 Regular Week 11 | Louisville | West Virginia | #6 | L31-38 |
| 2007 Regular Week 7 | Louisville | Cincinnati | #15 | W28-24 |
| 2005 Regular Week 2 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | #18 | L15-31 |
| 2004 Regular Week 14 | Tulsa | UTEP | #24 | W37-35 |
| 2004 Regular Week 8 | Tulsa | Boise State | #21 | L42-45 |
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Louisville
2007-2009 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS -3.5 • Win % 41.7%
Tulsa
2003-2006 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -2.9 • Win % 56.9%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Steve Kragthorpe sets the reference point in overall strength.
Steve Kragthorpe sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Steve Kragthorpe
Mixed
Mixed
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
2007-2009 • 15-21
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.0 during vs 9.6 baseline
-4.6
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-3.5 during vs 12.1 baseline
-15.6
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
1.2 during vs 15.0 baseline
-13.8
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 60.0% baseline
-60.0%
2003-2006 • 29-22
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.3 during vs 2.6 baseline
+4.7
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-2.9 during vs -17.7 baseline
+14.7
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-4.0 during vs -19.8 baseline
+15.8
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Louisville 2007
6-6 • SRS 5.0
Biggest Improvement
Tulsa 2005
9-4 • 14.7 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Louisville 2007
6-6 • SP Off 40.6
Best Defensive Season
Tulsa 2006
8-5 • SP Def 25.0
Setbacks
Worst Season
Tulsa 2004
4-8 • SRS -11.4
Biggest Drop
Louisville 2008
5-7 • -14.0 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Louisville | 2009 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -6.4 | -5.4 | 23.7 | 28.0 | +2.6 | -8.3% |
| Louisville | 2008 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -9.0 | -3.0 | 24.6 | 25.3 | -14.0 | -8.3% |
| Louisville | 2007 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | #10 | — | 5.0 | 12.1 | 40.6 | 29.2 | +3.1 | -11.5% |
| Tulsa | 2006 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | — | — | 1.9 | 2.1 | 27.0 | 25.0 | -1.4 | -7.7% |
| Tulsa | 2005 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 3.3 | 1.5 | 27.8 | 26.4 | +14.7 | +35.9% |
| Tulsa | 2004 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -11.4 | -14.0 | 32.6 | 42.2 | -5.9 | -28.2% |
| Tulsa | 2003 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | — | — | -5.5 | -5.6 | 33.5 | 37.7 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -2.9 • Peak SRS 4.9 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.6
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS -3.7 • Peak SRS 4.8 • 8 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.5
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS -3.7 • Peak SRS 5.9 • 8 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.5
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS -2.1 • Peak SRS 4.4 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.9
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS -2.1 • Peak SRS 3.9 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.8
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS -1.9 • Peak SRS 7.5 • 7 seasons
Best finish #25 • Volatility 6.2
Open profile →