Top 25
27-48
- Games
- 75
- Win rate
- 36.0%
Back to Coaches
Peak DominatorBalancedLong Career
Coach Profile
Tommy Tuberville
1995-2016 • Auburn, Cincinnati, Ole Miss, Texas Tech
4 schools coached, anchored by Auburn.
Tommy Tuberville coached 21 seasons, won 61.6%, and posted an average SRS of 5.0. Best season: 2004 Auburn. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 4 stints shaped the career arc.
- Career record
- 159-99
- Career win rate
- 61.6%
- Average SRS
- 5.0
- Peak SRS
- 22.7
Career Dossier
One glance at the full arc.
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
- Seasons coached
- 21
- Career span
- 22 years
- Best finish
- #2
- Consistency
- 27.8
Primary school anchor
Auburn
Balanced profile with 4 program stops and a peak score of 89.5.
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Tommy Tuberville
EliteStrongAverageLean
Tommy Tuberville: 1999 AuburnTommy Tuberville: 2010 Texas TechTommy Tuberville: 2013 Cincinnati
1995Actual season year • SRS range -11.7 to 22.72016
Active comparison point
Tommy Tuberville • 2004
2004 Auburn
Best season13-0 • SRS 22.7 • SP Overall 27.3
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+11.9
SP Off / Def
39.3 / 12.5
Finish
#2
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Ranked opponent record
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 10
18-23
- Games
- 41
- Win rate
- 43.9%
Top 5
6-5
- Games
- 11
- Win rate
- 54.5%
View ranked game results75
Tenure map
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger stint
Cincinnati
2013-2016 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -2.4 • Win % 56.9%
Texas Tech
2010-2012 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS 2.8 • Win % 54.0%
Auburn
1999-2008 • 10 seasons
Avg SRS 10.9 • Win % 68.0%
Ole Miss
1995-1998 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -0.5 • Win % 55.6%
- Longest tenure
- Auburn • 10 seasons
- Best tenure
- Auburn • 10.9 SRS
- Best tenure win rate
- Auburn • 68.0%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tommy Tuberville sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeTommy Tuberville sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tommy Tuberville
Strong
- Raw avg SP Overall
- 9.8
- Percentile
- 84th pct
Strong
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Impact by school
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
Cincinnati
2013-2016 • 29-22
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS -2.4Win % 56.9%
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.3 during vs 9.2 baseline
-1.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-2.4 during vs 6.9 baseline
-9.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
4.1 during vs 10.6 baseline
-6.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 60.0% baseline
-60.0%
Texas Tech
2010-2012 • 20-17
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS 2.8Win % 54.0%
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.7 during vs 9.0 baseline
-2.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
2.8 during vs 13.2 baseline
-10.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
9.7 during vs 23.2 baseline
-13.4
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 80.0% baseline
-80.0%
Auburn
1999-2008 • 85-40
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS 10.9Win % 68.0%
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.5 during vs 7.2 baseline
+1.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
10.9 during vs 11.0 baseline
-0.2
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
15.8 during vs 15.3 baseline
+0.4
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
60.0% during vs 80.0% baseline
-20.0%
Ole Miss
1995-1998 • 25-20
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS -0.5Win % 55.6%
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.3 during vs 6.4 baseline
-0.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-0.5 during vs 3.9 baseline
-4.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
0.8 during vs 5.5 baseline
-4.7
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
25.0% during vs 40.0% baseline
-15.0%
Career highs and lows
High Points
Best Season
Auburn 2004
13-0 • SRS 22.7
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 1997
8-4 • 21.6 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Texas Tech 2012
7-5 • SP Off 44.1
Best Defensive Season
Auburn 2007
9-4 • SP Def 11.3
Setbacks
Worst Season
Cincinnati 2016
4-8 • SRS -11.7
Biggest Drop
Auburn 2008
5-7 • -11.9 SRS
Season-by-season results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Cincinnati | 2016 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -11.7 | -3.6 | 24.5 | 27.3 | -11.8 | -20.5% |
| Cincinnati | 2015 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 0.1 | 5.3 | 34.4 | 28.2 | -1.5 | -15.4% |
| Cincinnati | 2014 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 1.6 | 6.9 | 36.3 | 29.8 | +1.0 | 0.0% |
| Cincinnati | 2013 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 0.6 | 7.8 | 31.9 | 21.6 | -7.3 | +10.9% |
| Texas Tech | 2012 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 7.9 | 17.0 | 44.1 | 26.5 | +8.3 | +16.7% |
| Texas Tech | 2011 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -0.4 | 4.8 | 38.6 | 34.5 | -1.3 | -19.9% |
| Texas Tech | 2010 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | — | — | 0.9 | 7.4 | 34.2 | 26.9 | -0.4 | +19.9% |
| Auburn | 2008 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | #10 | — | 1.3 | 1.4 | 19.7 | 17.4 | -11.9 | -27.6% |
| Auburn | 2007 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | #18 | #15 | 13.2 | 20.7 | 31.3 | 11.3 | -0.3 | -15.4% |
| Auburn | 2006 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #4 | #9 | 13.5 | 19.4 | 32.4 | 15.1 | -2.3 | +9.6% |
| Auburn | 2005 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | #16 | #14 | 15.8 | 20.7 | 35.4 | 14.7 | -6.9 | -25.0% |
| Auburn | 2004 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | #17 | #2 | 22.7 | 27.3 | 39.3 | 12.5 | +11.9 | +38.5% |
| Auburn | 2003 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #6 | — | 10.8 | 17.9 | 33.2 | 17.0 | -3.7 | -7.7% |
| Auburn | 2002 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #14 | 14.5 | 19.2 | 36.8 | 19.5 | +10.0 | +10.9% |
| Auburn | 2001 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 4.5 | 8.5 | 30.5 | 23.4 | -2.1 | -10.9% |
| Auburn | 2000 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #18 | 6.6 | 12.8 | 32.9 | 21.0 | +0.8 | +23.8% |
| Auburn | 1999 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | 5.8 | 9.8 | 30.3 | 21.8 | +6.0 | -9.1% |
| Ole Miss | 1998 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | — | — | -0.2 | -1.4 | 27.6 | 29.0 | -10.8 | -12.1% |
| Ole Miss | 1997 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | #22 | 10.6 | 17.0 | 33.0 | 17.5 | +21.6 | +21.2% |
| Ole Miss | 1996 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -11.0 | -10.3 | 21.1 | 30.7 | -9.8 | -9.1% |
| Ole Miss | 1995 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | — | — | -1.2 | -2.0 | 19.8 | 21.8 | — | — |
Similar coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
Len Casanova
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS 4.7 • Peak SRS 21.1 • 21 seasons
Best finish #15 • Volatility 8.5
Open profile →Rip Engle
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS 6.2 • Peak SRS 17.7 • 22 seasons
Best finish #9 • Volatility 8.2
Open profile →Don Faurot
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 5.8 • Peak SRS 26.7 • 20 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.7
Open profile →Wayne Hardin
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 5.2 • Peak SRS 19.6 • 18 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →Bronco Mendenhall
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 4.6 • Peak SRS 19.5 • 19 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 6.9
Open profile →Harry Stuhldreher
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 5.0 • Peak SRS 18.8 • 19 seasons
Best finish #3 • Volatility 7.3
Open profile →