Top 25
26-43
- Games
- 69
- Win rate
- 37.7%
Coach Profile
1995-2016 • Auburn, Cincinnati, Ole Miss, Texas Tech
4 schools coached, anchored by Auburn.
Tommy Tuberville's coaching record is 159-99, highlighted by seasons at Auburn from 1995 to 2016.
Tommy Tuberville coached 21 seasons, won 61.6%, and posted an average SRS of 5.0. Best season: 2004 Auburn. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 4 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Auburn
Balanced profile with 4 program stops and a peak score of 89.5.
Quick Answers
Headline records use countable season rows after completed-game fallback. Partial seasons and provisional placeholders are called out separately.
258 countable games, 61.6% win rate.
10 countable seasons at Auburn.
19 full season rows; partial and backfilled current rows are separated.
Rows where the coach-season record covers fewer games than the team's completed season.
38 games using AP ranking at game time.
9 games using AP ranking at game time.
Deep South's Oldest Rivalry games in this dataset.
14 scored postseason games in this dataset.
0 College Football Playoff-labeled games since 2014.
Matched by coach team-season against the national championship dataset.
Career records use countable coach-season rows. Zero-game placeholders are excluded from aggregates until a completed-game fallback can verify the record.
Completed-game fallback uses scored games joined by coach, team, and season; advanced ratings are left blank when the season summary has not supplied them.
Latest completed coached game in this dataset: Nov 26, 2016. Current and future zero-game placeholders are kept visible but excluded from headline records.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
13-0 • SRS 22.7 • SP Overall 27.3
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+11.9
SP Off / Def
39.3 / 12.5
Finish
#2
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
26-43
Top 10
17-21
Top 5
5-4
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Cincinnati
2013-2016 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -2.4 • Win % 56.9%
Texas Tech
2010-2012 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS 2.8 • Win % 54.0%
Auburn
1999-2008 • 10 seasons
Avg SRS 10.9 • Win % 68.0%
Ole Miss
1995-1998 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -0.5 • Win % 55.6%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tommy Tuberville sets the reference point in overall strength.
Tommy Tuberville sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tommy Tuberville
Strong
Strong
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
2013-2016 • 29-22
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.3 during vs 9.2 baseline
-1.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-2.4 during vs 6.9 baseline
-9.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
4.1 during vs 10.6 baseline
-6.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 60.0% baseline
-60.0%
2010-2012 • 20-17
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.5 during vs 9.0 baseline
-2.5
Avg SRS
Higher is better
0.3 during vs 13.2 baseline
-12.9
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
6.1 during vs 23.2 baseline
-17.1
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 80.0% baseline
-80.0%
1999-2008 • 85-40
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.5 during vs 7.2 baseline
+1.3
Avg SRS
Higher is better
10.9 during vs 11.0 baseline
-0.2
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
15.8 during vs 15.3 baseline
+0.4
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
60.0% during vs 80.0% baseline
-20.0%
1995-1998 • 25-20
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.3 during vs 6.4 baseline
-0.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-0.5 during vs 3.9 baseline
-4.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
1.6 during vs 5.5 baseline
-4.0
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
33.3% during vs 40.0% baseline
-6.7%
High Points
Best Season
Auburn 2004
13-0 • SRS 22.7
Biggest Improvement
Ole Miss 1997
8-4 • 21.6 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Texas Tech 2012
7-5 • SP Off 44.1
Best Defensive Season
Auburn 2007
9-4 • SP Def 11.3
Setbacks
Lowest SRS Season
Cincinnati 2016
4-8 • SRS -11.7
Biggest Drop
Auburn 2008
5-7 • -11.9 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Cincinnati | 2016 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -11.7 | -3.6 | 24.5 | 27.3 | -11.8 | -20.5% | Season summary |
| Cincinnati | 2015 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 0.1 | 5.3 | 34.4 | 28.2 | -1.5 | -15.4% | Season summary |
| Cincinnati | 2014 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 1.6 | 6.9 | 36.3 | 29.8 | +1.0 | 0.0% | Season summary |
| Cincinnati | 2013 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 0.6 | 7.8 | 31.9 | 21.6 | -7.3 | +10.9% | Season summary |
| Texas Tech | 2012 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 7.9 | 17.0 | 44.1 | 26.5 | +8.3 | +16.7% | Partial season |
| Texas Tech | 2011 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -0.4 | 4.8 | 38.6 | 34.5 | -1.3 | -19.9% | Season summary |
| Texas Tech | 2010 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | — | — | 0.9 | 7.4 | 34.2 | 26.9 | -0.4 | +19.9% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2008 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | #10 | — | 1.3 | 1.4 | 19.7 | 17.4 | -11.9 | -27.6% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2007 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | #18 | #15 | 13.2 | 20.7 | 31.3 | 11.3 | -0.3 | -15.4% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2006 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | #4 | #9 | 13.5 | 19.4 | 32.4 | 15.1 | -2.3 | +9.6% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2005 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | #16 | #14 | 15.8 | 20.7 | 35.4 | 14.7 | -6.9 | -25.0% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2004 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | #17 | #2 | 22.7 | 27.3 | 39.3 | 12.5 | +11.9 | +38.5% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2003 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #6 | — | 10.8 | 17.9 | 33.2 | 17.0 | -3.7 | -7.7% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2002 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #14 | 14.5 | 19.2 | 36.8 | 19.5 | +10.0 | +10.9% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2001 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 4.5 | 8.5 | 30.5 | 23.4 | -2.1 | -10.9% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 2000 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #18 | 6.6 | 12.8 | 32.9 | 21.0 | +0.8 | +23.8% | Season summary |
| Auburn | 1999 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | 5.8 | 9.8 | 30.3 | 21.8 | +6.0 | -9.1% | Season summary |
| Ole Miss | 1998 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | — | — | -0.2 | -1.4 | 27.6 | 29.0 | -10.8 | -12.1% | Partial season |
| Ole Miss | 1997 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | #22 | 10.6 | 17.0 | 33.0 | 17.5 | +21.6 | +21.2% | Season summary |
| Ole Miss | 1996 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -11.0 | -10.3 | 21.1 | 30.7 | -9.8 | -9.1% | Season summary |
| Ole Miss | 1995 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | — | — | -1.2 | -2.0 | 19.8 | 21.8 | — | — | Season summary |
Popular comparisons are fan-facing matchups. Statistical comps are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS 4.7 • Peak SRS 21.1 • 21 seasons
Best finish #15 • Volatility 8.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS 6.2 • Peak SRS 17.7 • 22 seasons
Best finish #9 • Volatility 8.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 5.8 • Peak SRS 26.7 • 20 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 5.2 • Peak SRS 19.6 • 18 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 4.6 • Peak SRS 19.5 • 19 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 6.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 5.0 • Peak SRS 18.8 • 19 seasons
Best finish #3 • Volatility 7.3
Open profile →