High School Profile
Danville, CA. Follow the volume, blue-chip spikes, destination programs, and draft conversion that define this recruiting pipeline.
Recruiting answers
Quick answers for school, city, state, recruit, destination, and draft searches.
Overview
The quick facts that frame this school's recruiting footprint.
First recruit year
2003
Latest recruit year
2026
Top college destination
Stanford
Most common position group
QB
Best class by recruits
2017 (3)
Best class by blue-chip
2010 (2)
Timeline
Year-by-year recruiting output, blue-chip spikes, and drafted-player classes.
Stars
The mix of 3-star, 4-star, 5-star, and unrated recruits in this school's history.
Best Classes
The years that delivered the biggest jumps in volume, premium talent, and draft outcomes.
Most FBS recruits
2017 (3)
Most blue-chip recruits
2010 (2)
Most drafted players
2017 (1)
Destinations
Which colleges sign the most recruits from this school?
Positions
The position groups this school produces most often.
Draft Outcomes
Which recruits from this high school eventually got drafted, and where did they land?
Context
A compact readout of the signals that matter most when comparing this school to other pipelines.
Blue-chip concentration
4 premium prospects
26.7% of known FBS recruits were four-stars or five-stars.
Draft conversion
13.3%
Draft status stays visible even when round and pick data are incomplete.
Top destination lane
Stanford
2 recruits reached the leading destination program.
Draft Table
Draft year, round, and pick stay optional so drafted status remains visible even when the player bridge is incomplete.
| Player | Class | Stars | Position | College | Draft Year | Round | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Haener | 2017 | 3★ | PRO | Washington | 2023 | 4 | 25 |
| Zach Ertz | 2009 | 4★ | TE | Stanford | 2013 | 2 | 3 |
Top Recruits
Sorted by stars, rating, class year, and name to keep the table deterministic.
| Player | Class | Stars | Rating | Position | College | Drafted | Draft Round |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Wright | 2003 | 5★ | 1.00 | PRO | Miami | No | — |
| Brett Nottingham | 2010 | 4★ | 0.92 | PRO | Stanford | No | — |
| Zach Ertz | 2009 | 4★ | 0.91 | TE | Stanford | Yes | 2 |
| David Wilkerson | 2010 | 4★ | 0.90 | ILB | California | No | — |
| Drew McAllister | 2008 | 3★ | 0.89 | S | — | No | — |
| Mike Costanzo | 2006 | 3★ | 0.89 | OG | California | No | — |
| Kellan Ford | 2025 | 3★ | 0.88 | TE | — | No | — |
| Dakota Dickson | 2026 | 3★ | 0.88 | DL | — | No | — |
| Julian McMahan | 2025 | 3★ | 0.87 | RB | Washington | No | — |
| Erik Krommenhoek | 2017 | 3★ | 0.87 | TE | USC | No | — |
| Jake Haener | 2017 | 3★ | 0.86 | PRO | Washington | Yes | 4 |
| Nate Landman | 2017 | 3★ | 0.86 | OLB | Colorado | No | — |
| Nate Rutchena | 2020 | 3★ | 0.85 | ATH | — | No | — |
| Brayden Turner | 2025 | 3★ | 0.84 | QB | Fresno State | No | — |
| Sam DeSa | 2003 | 3★ | 0.83 | WR | — | No | — |
| Brendan Landman | 2014 | 3★ | 0.82 | TE | — | No | — |
| Corey Luciano | 2017 | 3★ | 0.82 | OT | — | No | — |
| Connor Shay | 2020 | 3★ | 0.81 | OLB | Wyoming | No | — |
| Jacob Oliphant | 2020 | 3★ | 0.81 | ATH | Cal Poly | No | — |
| David Hayward | 2019 | 2★ | 0.78 | OT | Army | No | — |
| Nikita Zamora | 2014 | 2★ | 0.77 | PRO | — | No | — |
| Jacob Welter | 2011 | 2★ | 0.77 | OG | Ohio | No | — |
| Tommy Haug | 2004 | 2★ | 0.77 | APB | Nevada | No | — |
Similar Schools
Peers are ranked by same-state preference plus nearby recruit volume, draft rate, and position profile.
Explore More
Jump from this school into state views, national slices, destination programs, and player pages.
Compare this school against every other pipeline in CA.
See how this program compares once the leaderboard enforces a recruit threshold.
Jump into the national 5-star leaderboard.
Follow the strongest destination pipeline out of this school.
Follow the strongest destination pipeline out of this school.