Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2014-2017North Carolina
Brandon Harris
QB • 6'3" • 220 lbs • Bossier City, LA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Brandon Harris is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
33.5
Consistency
44.7
Season Value
29.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · LSU
1415151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- LSU • North Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Harris, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · LSU. Brandon Harris is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Brandon Harris played QB for LSU and North Carolina. Across 4 tracked seasons, Brandon Harris recorded 3,102 passing yards, 456 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with LSU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
LSU paired 2,391 primary output with 63.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across LSU, North Carolina.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Loss with 226 yards of offense and 68 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · North Carolina
Games
6
Primary Metric / G
72
Efficiency
33.5
Usage
18.8
Consistency
44.7
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 65. Louisville: 226. Old Dominion: 14. Georgia Tech: 0. Virginia: 71. Virginia Tech: 56
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 21 by 33.8. Louisville: 28 by 68. Old Dominion: 4 by 42.5. Georgia Tech: 1 by 0. Virginia: 28 by 29.6. Virginia Tech: 23 by 27.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses83.6 · Games = 5
First Half101.7 · Games = 3 · +59.3 vs Second Half
Second Half42.3 · Games = 3 · -59.3 vs First Half
All Games72 · Games = 6
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
68 vs Louisville
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/21 | @ Virginia Tech | L 7-59 | 4 | 11 | 24 | 36.4 | 0 | 2 | 27.1 | 12 | 32 | 2.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Virginia | L 14-20 | 7 | 18 | 46 | 38.9 | 0 | 3 | 29.6 | 10 | 25 | 2.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Georgia Tech | L 7-33 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Old Dominion | W 53-23 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 42.5 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Louisville | L 35-47 | 17 | 23 | 216 | 73.9 | 1 | 0 | 68 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs California | L 30-35 | 7 | 16 | 60 | 43.8 | 0 | 2 | 33.8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2014-2016
Opening stop
- 2
North Carolina
2017
Final stop
Season Progression
20142015201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | LSU | 611 | 58.5 | 7.3 | — |
| 2015 Postseason | LSU | 2,391 | 63.6 | 14.1 | 1,780 |
| 2015 Regular Season | LSU | 2,391 | 63.6 | 14.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | LSU | 124 | 45 | 13.8 | -2,267 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Carolina | 432 | 33.5 | 18.8 | 308 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with 214 yards of offense and 87.6 efficiency.
214
Primary metric
214 total offense with 87.6 efficiency.
#2
Louisville
226
Primary metric
Loss with 226 yards of offense and 68 efficiency.
226 total offense with 68 efficiency.
#3
Ole Miss
384
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
384 total offense with 72.1 efficiency.
#4
Texas Tech
302
Primary metric
Win with 302 yards of offense and 84.5 efficiency.
302 total offense with 84.5 efficiency.
#5
Mississippi State
159
Primary metric
Loss with 159 yards of offense and 79.3 efficiency.
159 total offense with 79.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · LSU
2,391 primary output · 63.6 efficiency · 14.1 usage
61.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · LSU
61.9
2,391 primary · 63.6 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · LSU
34.4
611 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
Milestones
3
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
13
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9651
Parkway · Bossier City, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,558
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.