Usage Score
9.5
Player Dossier
2014-2017Alabama
Cam Sims
WR • 6'5" • 214 lbs • Monroe, LA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cam Sims reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.9
Consistency
48.8
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Alabama
1415161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cam Sims, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Alabama. Cam Sims reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Alabama paired 207 primary output with 79.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Alabama
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
18.8
Efficiency
79.9
Usage
9.5
Consistency
48.8
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 13. Florida State: 0. Fresno State: 28. Colorado State: 7. Vanderbilt: 11. Ole Miss: 60. Arkansas: 20. Tennessee: 14. LSU: 15. Mississippi State: 18. Unknown: 21
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 1 by 86.7. Fresno State: 3 by 62.2. Colorado State: 1 by 46.7. Vanderbilt: 1 by 73.3. Ole Miss: 1 by 100. Arkansas: 2 by 66.7. Tennessee: 1 by 93.3. LSU: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 70
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins18.6 · Games = 10
First Half19.8 · Games = 6 · +2.2 vs Second Half
Second Half17.6 · Games = 5 · -2.2 vs First Half
All Games18.8 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/9 | @ Georgia | W 26-23 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 13 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Mississippi State | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/5 | vs LSU | W 24-10 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Tennessee | W 45-7 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Arkansas | W 41-9 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/1 | vs Ole Miss | W 66-3 | — | 1 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 0 | 60 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Vanderbilt | W 59-0 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Colorado State | W 41-23 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Fresno State | W 41-10 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Florida State | W 24-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 62 | 68.1 | 11.2 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 46 | 51.2 | 16.3 | -16 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 152 | 63.3 | 11.8 | 106 |
| 2017 Postseason | Alabama | 207 | 79.9 | 9.5 | 55 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 207 | 79.9 | 9.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54
Primary metric
54 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#2
Ole Miss
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
33
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
25
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 55.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Alabama
207 primary output · 79.9 efficiency · 9.5 usage
59.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Alabama
59.5
207 primary · 79.9 efficiency · 9.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Alabama
51.5
152 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 11.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9619
Ouachita Parish · Monroe, LA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
467
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.