Usage Score
4.7
Player Dossier
2014-2017Texas A&M
Zaycoven Henderson
DL • 6'2" • 305 lbs • Longview, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Zaycoven Henderson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.4
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
14.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
1415161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zaycoven Henderson, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M. Zaycoven Henderson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 13 primary output with 22.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 18.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
18.4
Usage
4.7
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 0. Unknown: 1. Louisiana: 0. Arkansas: 2. South Carolina: 2. Alabama: 1.5. Florida: 1. Mississippi State: 0. Auburn: 0. New Mexico: 0. Ole Miss: 0. LSU: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Louisiana: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas: 4 by 36.7. South Carolina: 3 by 32.5. Alabama: 4 by 31.7. Florida: 3 by 22.5. Mississippi State: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 7 by 29.2. New Mexico: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=6 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=5 · -0.5 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=6 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · n=6 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
36.7 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | @ LSU | L 21-45 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | @ Ole Miss | W 31-24 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs New Mexico | W 55-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Auburn | L 27-42 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Mississippi State | L 14-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Florida | W 19-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Alabama | L 19-27 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs South Carolina | W 24-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Arkansas | W 50-43 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Louisiana | W 45-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | @ UCLA | L 44-45 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 13 | 22.8 | 6.7 | 13 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 13 | 22.8 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 7.5 | 18.4 | 4.7 | -5.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.9 takeover score.
#2
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#3
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#4
Ole Miss
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.6 takeover score.
#5
Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
13 primary output · 22.8 efficiency · 6.7 usage
30.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
30.2
13 primary · 22.8 efficiency · 6.7 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Texas A&M
14.1
7.5 primary · 18.4 efficiency · 4.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.915
Longview · Longview, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
75
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.