Usage Score
24.2
Player Dossier
2014-2016Texas A&M
Josh Reynolds
WR • 6'4" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Josh Reynolds reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94
Consistency
73.9
Season Value
73
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Reynolds, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M. Josh Reynolds reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 1,039 primary output with 94 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
79.9
Efficiency
94
Usage
24.2
Consistency
73.9
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 154. UCLA: 78. Unknown: 53. Auburn: 98. Arkansas: 141. South Carolina: 29. Tennessee: 89. Alabama: 27. New Mexico State: 71. Mississippi State: 85. Ole Miss: 70. UTSA: 93. LSU: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 12 by 85.6. UCLA: 4 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Auburn: 7 by 93.3. Arkansas: 4 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 64.4. Tennessee: 5 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 90. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 100. UTSA: 7 by 88.6. LSU: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins85.6 · n=7 · +8.2 vs Losses
Losses77.4 · n=5 · -8.2 vs Wins
First Half91.7 · n=7 · +25.5 vs Second Half
Second Half66.2 · n=6 · -25.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Kansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-33 | — | 12 | 154 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 2 | 37 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs LSU | L 39-54 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UTSA | W 23-10 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Ole Miss | L 28-29 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Mississippi State | L 28-35 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs New Mexico State | W 52-10 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Alabama | L 14-33 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tennessee | W 45-38 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ South Carolina | W 24-13 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards | W 45-24 | — | 4 | 141 | 35.3 | 35.30 | 1 | 92 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn | W 29-16 | — | 7 | 98 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLA | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Texas A&M | 842 | 84.4 | 16 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 842 | 84.4 | 16 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Texas A&M | 907 | 83.7 | 20.4 | 65 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 907 | 83.7 | 20.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,039 | 94 | 24.2 | 132 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,039 | 94 | 24.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
177
Primary metric
177 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas State
154
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 85.6 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
125
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Mississippi State
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
1,039 primary output · 94 efficiency · 24.2 usage
73
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
73
1,039 primary · 94 efficiency · 24.2 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Texas A&M
67.1
842 primary · 84.4 efficiency · 16 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8081
Lowndes · Valdosta, GA
- Committed To
- Kent State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,788
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.