Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2014-2016Texas A&M
Speedy Noil
WR • 5'11" • New Orleans, LA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Speedy Noil reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.7
Consistency
52.7
Season Value
52.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Texas A&M
14141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Speedy Noil, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Texas A&M. Speedy Noil reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 583 primary output with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
36.1
Efficiency
85.7
Usage
16.3
Consistency
52.7
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 25. Auburn: 59. Arkansas: 0. Tennessee: 32. Alabama: 0. New Mexico State: 12. Mississippi State: 36. Ole Miss: 59. LSU: 102
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 41.7. Auburn: 2 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 100. New Mexico State: 1 by 80. Mississippi State: 3 by 80. Ole Miss: 4 by 98.3. LSU: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins25.8 · n=4 · -23.5 vs Losses
Losses49.3 · n=4 · +23.5 vs Wins
First Half23.2 · n=5 · -29.1 vs Second Half
Second Half52.3 · n=4 · +29.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs LSU100 receiving yards | L 39-54 | — | 5 | 102 | 20.4 | 20.40 | 0 | 48 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Ole Miss | L 28-29 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Mississippi State | L 28-35 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs New Mexico State | W 52-10 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Alabama | L 14-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tennessee | W 45-38 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Arkansas | W 45-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn | W 29-16 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Texas A&M | 583 | 81 | 15.7 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 583 | 81 | 15.7 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 226 | 65.7 | 12.7 | -357 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 325 | 85.7 | 16.3 | 99 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Vanderbilt
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#4
Ole Miss
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 63.6 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Texas A&M
583 primary output · 81 efficiency · 15.7 usage
66.1
#2
2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M
66.1
583 primary · 81 efficiency · 15.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
52.8
325 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 16.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9952
Edna Karr · New Orleans, LA
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,134
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.