Usage Score
5
Player Dossier
2014-2016Mississippi State
Jamoral Graham
DB • 5'10" • Decatur, MS, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jamoral Graham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
20.2
Consistency
53.3
Season Value
22.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State
14151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Mississippi State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamoral Graham, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Jamoral Graham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.2 disruption score.
Jamoral Graham played DB for Mississippi State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jamoral Graham recorded 78 receiving yards, 28 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Mississippi State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Mississippi State
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
20.2
Usage
5
Consistency
53.3
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 1. South Alabama: 1. South Carolina: 0. LSU: 1.5. Massachusetts: 3. Auburn: 0. Unknown: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Alabama: 1. Arkansas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 3 by 22.5. South Alabama: 6 by 35. South Carolina: 4 by 16.7. LSU: 4 by 31.7. Massachusetts: 3 by 42.5. Auburn: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Alabama: 3 by 22.5. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · Games = 5 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/26 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-16 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Arkansas | L 42-58 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Alabama | L 3-51 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas A&M | W 35-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Auburn | L 14-38 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Massachusetts | W 47-35 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ LSU | L 20-23 | 4 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs South Carolina | W 27-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs South Alabama | L 20-21 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Mississippi State | 8.5 | 20.2 | 5 | 8.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 8.5 | 20.2 | 5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
#2
LSU
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 29.7 takeover score.
#3
South Alabama
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.2 takeover score.
#4
Miami (OH)
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.6 takeover score.
#5
Alabama
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 21.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Mississippi State
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2016 Postseason · Mississippi State
22.3
8.5 primary · 20.2 efficiency · 5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Mississippi State
22.3
8.5 primary · 20.2 efficiency · 5 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9167
Newton County · Decatur, MS
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
28
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.