Player Stats

Jesse Jackson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
373
Receptions
37
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonMississippi State0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonMississippi State0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonMississippi State317021.5
2017 PostseasonMississippi State12338069.6
2017 Regular SeasonMississippi State1224238069.6
2018 Regular SeasonMississippi State5990141.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Mississippi State paired 276 primary output with 66.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 58.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Mississippi State

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

18

Efficiency

58.9

Usage

13.5

Consistency

30.7

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 6. Florida: 8. Texas A&M: 1. Louisiana Tech: 44. Ole Miss: 31

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 1 by 40. Florida: 1 by 53.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 3.3. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 97.8. Ole Miss: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins20.5 · Games = 4 · +12.5 vs Losses
Losses8 · Games = 1 · -12.5 vs Wins