Usage Score
6.1
Player Dossier
2014-2017Mississippi State
DB • 6'0" • 202 lbs • Clarksdale, MS, USA
J.T. Gray shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.1
Efficiency
30.9
Consistency
64.6
Season Value
30.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
J.T. Gray, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Mississippi State. J.T. Gray shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.9 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 13.5 primary output with 30.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
30.9
Usage
6.1
Consistency
64.6
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 1. Unknown: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. LSU: 2. Georgia: 0. Auburn: 0.5. BYU: 1. Kentucky: 0. Texas A&M: 2. Massachusetts: 2. Alabama: 2. Arkansas: 1. Ole Miss: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 4 by 26.7. Unknown: 5 by 20.8. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 22.5. LSU: 6 by 45. Georgia: 6 by 25. Auburn: 8 by 38.3. BYU: 8 by 43.3. Kentucky: 7 by 29.2. Texas A&M: 3 by 32.5. Massachusetts: 5 by 40.8. Alabama: 4 by 36.7. Arkansas: 1 by 14.2. Ole Miss: 4 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
45 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | vs Louisville | W 31-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Ole Miss | L 28-31 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Arkansas | W 28-21 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Alabama | L 24-31 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Massachusetts | W 34-23 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Texas A&M | W 35-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Kentucky | W 45-7 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs BYU | W 35-10 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Auburn | L 10-49 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Georgia | L 3-31 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs LSU | W 37-7 | 6 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 57-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Mississippi State | 9 | 29.7 | 8.5 | 9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 9 | 29.7 | 8.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Mississippi State | 13.5 | 30.9 | 6.1 | 4.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 13.5 | 30.9 | 6.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.3 takeover score.
#2
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.6 takeover score.
#3
LSU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.5 takeover score.
#4
Massachusetts
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51 takeover score.
#5
Alabama
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Mississippi State
13.5 primary output · 30.9 efficiency · 6.1 usage
30.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Mississippi State
30.2
13.5 primary · 30.9 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Mississippi State
22.6
9 primary · 29.7 efficiency · 8.5 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8826
Winnetonka · Kansas City, MO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
135
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
J.T. Gray quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit