Player Stats

Dontavian Lee College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
330
Rushing yards
310
Receiving yards
20
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonMississippi State00000-
2015 PostseasonMississippi State8220047.3
2015 Regular SeasonMississippi State815013515047.3
2016 Regular SeasonMississippi State732275024.1
2017 Regular SeasonMississippi State864640141.1
2018 Regular SeasonMississippi State682820132.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Mississippi State paired 152 primary output with 49.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 37 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas

Win with 38 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Mississippi State

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

13.7

Efficiency

37

Usage

5.6

Consistency

24.5

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Stephen F. Austin: 29. Louisiana: 4. Texas A&M: 0. Louisiana Tech: 7. Arkansas: 38. Ole Miss: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stephen F. Austin: 6 by 50.3. Louisiana: 2 by 20.8. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 36.5. Arkansas: 7 by 56.5. Ole Miss: 2 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half11 · Games = 3 · -5.3 vs Second Half
Second Half16.3 · Games = 3 · +5.3 vs First Half