Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 3 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Postseason | Mississippi State | 3 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 65 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 3 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 1 | 65 |
| 2016 Postseason | Mississippi State | 13 | 6 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 40.1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 13 | 56 | 1 | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 40.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 11 | 32 | 0.5 | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 34.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 3 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 15.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
15.3
Usage
3.2
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Charleston Southern: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. LSU: 1. Georgia: 0. Auburn: 0.5. BYU: 2. Kentucky: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Alabama: 0. Ole Miss: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Charleston Southern: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2. LSU: 5 by 30.8. Georgia: 1 by 4.2. Auburn: 11 by 50.8. BYU: 5 by 40.8. Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Massachusetts: 3 by 12.5. Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.