Player Stats

John Battle College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
139
TFL
2.5
Sacks
0.5
Passes defended
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonLSU00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonLSU10-0--044.2
2016 PostseasonLSU115-0-2024.4
2016 Regular SeasonLSU1134-0-2024.4
2017 PostseasonLSU122-0--053
2017 Regular SeasonLSU12592.50.5-4053
2018 PostseasonLSU92-0-1045.5
2018 Regular SeasonLSU937-0-1045.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

LSU paired 8 primary output with 27.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 23.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · LSU

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

23.6

Usage

4.8

Consistency

55.4

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCF: 1. Miami: 1. SE Louisiana: 0. Auburn: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Florida: 0. Georgia: 1. Mississippi State: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 2 by 18.3. Miami: 3 by 22.5. SE Louisiana: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 4 by 26.7. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 5 by 20.8. Florida: 10 by 41.7. Georgia: 8 by 43.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 8 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -0.6 vs Wins