Player Stats

Brandon Lee College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
119
TFL
11
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
6
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonMissouri00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonMissouri00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonMissouri113742-1033.4
2017 PostseasonMissouri1251.50--055.2
2017 Regular SeasonMissouri12373.50.524255.2
2018 Regular SeasonMissouri114020-1019.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Missouri paired 12.5 primary output with 25 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 17.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Missouri

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.3

Efficiency

17.9

Usage

3.5

Consistency

6.1

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UT Martin: 0. Wyoming: 0. Purdue: 0. Georgia: 0. South Carolina: 1. Alabama: 0. Memphis: 0. Kentucky: 0. Florida: 0. Vanderbilt: 0. Arkansas: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UT Martin: 1 by 4.2. Wyoming: 4 by 16.7. Purdue: 2 by 8.3. Georgia: 5 by 20.8. South Carolina: 7 by 39.2. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Memphis: 2 by 8.3. Kentucky: 4 by 16.7. Florida: 5 by 20.8. Vanderbilt: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas: 4 by 36.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 7 · +0.0 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 4 · -0.0 vs Wins