Usage Score
32.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Houston
Linell Bonner
WR • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Linell Bonner reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69
Consistency
62.9
Season Value
60.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston
1314151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Linell Bonner, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Houston. Linell Bonner reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Houston paired 1,118 primary output with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Houston
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
80.8
Efficiency
69
Usage
32.4
Consistency
62.9
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 39. Arizona: 59. Rice: 132. Texas Tech: 66. Temple: 43. Tulsa: 44. Memphis: 121. South Florida: 40. East Carolina: 147. Tulane: 100. Navy: 98
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 7 by 37.1. Arizona: 9 by 43.7. Rice: 10 by 88. Texas Tech: 7 by 62.9. Temple: 6 by 47.8. Tulsa: 5 by 58.7. Memphis: 8 by 100. South Florida: 6 by 44.4. East Carolina: 7 by 100. Tulane: 7 by 95.2. Navy: 8 by 81.7
Split Comparison
Wins86.5 · n=6 · +12.5 vs Losses
Losses74 · n=5 · -12.5 vs Wins
First Half63.8 · n=6 · -37.4 vs Second Half
Second Half101.2 · n=5 · +37.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/25 | vs Fresno State | L 27-33 | — | 7 | 39 | 4.6 | 5.60 | 1 | 18 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs NavyHigh volume | W 24-14 | — | 8 | 98 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Tulane100 receiving yards | L 17-20 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards | W 52-27 | — | 7 | 147 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ South Florida | W 28-24 | — | 6 | 40 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Fri 10/20 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 38-42 | — | 8 | 121 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tulsa | L 17-45 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Temple | W 20-13 | — | 6 | 43 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Texas Tech | L 24-27 | — | 7 | 66 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Rice100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-3 | — | 10 | 132 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 9/10 | @ ArizonaHigh volume | W 19-16 | — | 9 | 59 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 1 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Houston | 317 | 77.4 | 13.5 | 317 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Houston | 317 | 77.4 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Houston | 1,118 | 74.8 | 29.2 | 801 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 1,118 | 74.8 | 29.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Houston | 889 | 69 | 32.4 | -229 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 889 | 69 | 32.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147
Primary metric
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
235
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
235 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 87.6 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Houston
1,118 primary output · 74.8 efficiency · 29.2 usage
65.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Houston
65.3
1,118 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 29.2 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Houston
60.6
889 primary · 69 efficiency · 32.4 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,324
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.