Player Stats

Nicholas Norris College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,091
Receptions
194
Touchdowns
28

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky1133431455
2014 PostseasonWestern Kentucky11333037.8
2014 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky1119338237.8
2015 PostseasonWestern Kentucky145120267.1
2015 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky1458851567.1
2016 PostseasonWestern Kentucky14365186.6
2016 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky14731,2531486.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Western Kentucky paired 1,318 primary output with 92.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 92.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Western Kentucky

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

94.1

Efficiency

92.6

Usage

25

Consistency

70.4

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 65. Rice: 147. Alabama: 20. Miami (OH): 187. Vanderbilt: 45. Houston Christian: 53. Louisiana Tech: 108. Middle Tennessee: 87. Old Dominion: 90. Florida Atlantic: 131. Florida International: 66. North Texas: 90. Marshall: 79. Louisiana Tech: 150

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 3 by 100. Rice: 7 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 66.7. Miami (OH): 11 by 100. Vanderbilt: 4 by 75. Houston Christian: 2 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 72. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 82.9. Old Dominion: 6 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 100. Florida International: 3 by 100. North Texas: 5 by 100. Marshall: 3 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins104.1 · Games = 11 · +46.4 vs Losses
Losses57.7 · Games = 3 · -46.4 vs Wins