Usage Score
4
Player Dossier
2013-2016East Carolina
Travon Simmons
DB • 5'10" • Marietta, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Travon Simmons shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.1
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
12.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · East Carolina
13141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- East Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Travon Simmons, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · East Carolina. Travon Simmons shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
East Carolina paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 22.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · East Carolina
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
22.1
Usage
4
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1. NC State: 0. South Carolina: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. UCF: 1. South Florida: 1. Cincinnati: 0. UConn: 0.5. Tulsa: 1. SMU: 0. Navy: 0. Temple: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. NC State: 7 by 29.2. South Carolina: 3 by 12.5. Virginia Tech: 8 by 33.3. UCF: 3 by 22.5. South Florida: 5 by 30.8. Cincinnati: 8 by 33.3. UConn: 5 by 25.8. Tulsa: 5 by 30.8. SMU: 2 by 8.3. Navy: 1 by 4.2. Temple: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.3 · Games = 2 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 9 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
33.3 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Temple | L 10-37 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Navy | L 31-66 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs SMU | L 31-55 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | @ Tulsa | L 24-45 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UConn | W 41-3 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Cincinnati | L 19-31 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ South Florida | L 22-38 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs UCF | L 29-47 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Virginia Tech | L 17-54 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ South Carolina | L 15-20 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs NC State | W 33-30 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
East Carolina
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | East Carolina | 4.5 | 22.1 | 4 | 4.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
South Florida
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#3
Tulsa
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.7 takeover score.
#5
UCF
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · East Carolina
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · East Carolina
12.1
4.5 primary · 22.1 efficiency · 4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · East Carolina
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7583
Hillgrove · Powder Springs, GA
- Committed To
- East Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
53
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.