Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2013-2016Southern Miss
Nick Mullens
QB • 6'1" • Hoover, AL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Nick Mullens is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
57.7
Consistency
75.2
Season Value
55.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Southern Miss
131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Southern Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Mullens, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Southern Miss. Nick Mullens is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Southern Miss paired 4,384 primary output with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 599 yards of offense and 67.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Southern Miss
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
292.1
Efficiency
57.7
Usage
11.4
Consistency
75.2
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 330. Kentucky: 244. Unknown: 219. Troy: 270. UTEP: 186. Rice: 599. UTSA: 363. LSU: 147. Marshall: 286. Charlotte: 236. Louisiana Tech: 333
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 42 by 56.1. Kentucky: 38 by 49.6. Unknown: 22 by 66.3. Troy: 54 by 52. UTEP: 31 by 59.6. Rice: 43 by 67.4. UTSA: 49 by 52. LSU: 40 by 51.7. Marshall: 45 by 54.4. Charlotte: 30 by 56.8. Louisiana Tech: 41 by 68.6
Split Comparison
Wins329.7 · n=6 · +75.7 vs Losses
Losses254 · n=4 · -75.7 vs Wins
First Half308 · n=6 · +35 vs Second Half
Second Half273 · n=5 · -35 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
68.6 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/18 | @ Louisiana300-yard game | W 28-21 | 25 | 40 | 346 | 62.5 | 2 | 1 | 56.1 | 2 | -16 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Louisiana Tech300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 39-24 | 29 | 33 | 342 | 87.9 | 3 | 0 | 68.6 | 8 | -9 | -1.10 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Charlotte | L 27-38 | 19 | 25 | 249 | 76.0 | 2 | 2 | 56.8 | 5 | -13 | -2.60 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Marshall300-yard game | W 24-14 | 22 | 40 | 300 | 55.0 | 1 | 0 | 54.4 | 5 | -14 | -2.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ LSU | L 10-45 | 25 | 36 | 161 | 69.4 | 0 | 0 | 51.7 | 4 | -14 | -3.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UTSA300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 32-55 | 24 | 47 | 370 | 51.1 | 3 | 1 | 52 | 2 | -7 | -3.50 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Rice300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 44-28 | 25 | 36 | 591 | 69.4 | 4 | 1 | 67.4 | 7 | 8 | 1.10 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ UTEP3+ TD | W 34-7 | 16 | 27 | 176 | 59.3 | 3 | 0 | 59.6 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Troy | L 31-37 | 24 | 52 | 263 | 46.2 | 1 | 2 | 52 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 16 | 20 | 216 | 80.0 | 3 | 1 | 66.3 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Kentucky3+ TD | W 44-35 | 18 | 28 | 258 | 64.3 | 2 | 3 | 49.6 | 10 | -14 | -1.40 | 2 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Southern Miss
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 1,673 | 42.2 | 17.7 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 2,509 | 59.1 | 17.7 | 836 |
| 2015 Postseason | Southern Miss | 4,384 | 62.3 | 10 | 1,875 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 4,384 | 62.3 | 10 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Southern Miss | 3,213 | 57.7 | 11.4 | -1,171 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 3,213 | 57.7 | 11.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with 386 yards of offense and 91.4 efficiency.
386
Primary metric
386 total offense with 91.4 efficiency.
#2
Rice
599
Primary metric
Win with 599 yards of offense and 67.4 efficiency.
599 total offense with 67.4 efficiency.
#3
Middle Tennessee
439
Primary metric
Loss with 439 yards of offense and 62.8 efficiency.
439 total offense with 62.8 efficiency.
#4
Nebraska
422
Primary metric
Loss with 422 yards of offense and 63.6 efficiency.
422 total offense with 63.6 efficiency.
#5
UAB
360
Primary metric
Win with 360 yards of offense and 57.6 efficiency.
360 total offense with 57.6 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Southern Miss
4,384 primary output · 62.3 efficiency · 10 usage
65.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Southern Miss
65.7
4,384 primary · 62.3 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Southern Miss
55.6
3,213 primary · 57.7 efficiency · 11.4 usage
Milestones
27
250+ passing yards
15
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7831
Spain Park · Birmingham, AL
- Committed To
- Southern Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
11,779
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.