Usage Score
5
Player Dossier
2013-2016Eastern Michigan
WR • 5'11" • Palmyra, VA, USA
Austin Stone reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5
Efficiency
62.4
Consistency
28
Season Value
48.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Stone, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Austin Stone reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 136 primary output with 62.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 62.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
19.4
Efficiency
62.4
Usage
5
Consistency
28
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Old Dominion: 4. Akron: 7. Toledo: 20. Northern Illinois: 23. Western Michigan: 8. Massachusetts: 5. Central Michigan: 69
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Old Dominion: 1 by 26.7. Akron: 1 by 46.7. Toledo: 1 by 100. Northern Illinois: 2 by 76.7. Western Michigan: 1 by 53.3. Massachusetts: 1 by 33.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Eastern Michigan
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 8 | 53.3 | 7.1 | 8 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 136 | 62.4 | 5 | 128 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 0 | — | — | -136 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69
Primary metric
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
136 primary output · 62.4 efficiency · 5 usage
48.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
41.5
8 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 7.1 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7444
Fork Union Military (HS) · Fork Union, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
144
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Austin Stone quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit