Player Stats

De'Andre Simmons College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
30
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky10-0--043.7
2016 PostseasonWestern Kentucky132-0--036.7
2016 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky1328-0-8036.7
2017 Regular SeasonWestern Kentucky00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Western Kentucky paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 16.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Western Kentucky

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

16.5

Usage

2.1

Consistency

12.8

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 0. Rice: 2. Alabama: 0. Miami (OH): 3. Vanderbilt: 0. Houston Christian: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. Old Dominion: 0. Florida International: 0. North Texas: 2. Marshall: 1. Louisiana Tech: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 1 by 24.2. Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Miami (OH): 1 by 34.2. Vanderbilt: 1 by 4.2. Houston Christian: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 4.2. Old Dominion: 1 by 4.2. Florida International: 4 by 16.7. North Texas: 1 by 24.2. Marshall: 5 by 30.8. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 43.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 10 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.9 vs Wins