Usage Score
12.7
Player Dossier
2013-2016Toledo
DeJuan Rogers
DB • 6'0" • Detroit, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
DeJuan Rogers shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
38.6
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
29
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Toledo
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeJuan Rogers, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Toledo. DeJuan Rogers shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Toledo paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 38.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
38.6
Usage
12.7
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 0. Arkansas State: 0. Unknown: 2. Fresno State: 0. BYU: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1. Bowling Green: 0. Central Michigan: 3. Ohio: 1. Akron: 1. Northern Illinois: 1. Ball State: 0. Western Michigan: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 12 by 50. Arkansas State: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 4 by 36.7. Fresno State: 4 by 16.7. BYU: 12 by 50. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 35. Bowling Green: 5 by 20.8. Central Michigan: 5 by 50.8. Ohio: 10 by 51.7. Akron: 4 by 26.7. Northern Illinois: 8 by 43.3. Ball State: 9 by 37.5. Western Michigan: 12 by 70
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=8 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=4 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=7 · -0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
70 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | vs App State10+ tackles | L 28-31 | 12 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Western Michigan10+ tackles | L 35-55 | 12 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/17 | vs Ball State | W 37-19 | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/10 | @ Northern Illinois | W 31-24 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/2 | @ Akron | W 48-17 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/27 | vs Ohio10+ tackles | L 26-31 | 10 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Central Michigan | W 31-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Bowling Green | W 42-35 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 35-20 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ BYU10+ tackles | L 53-55 | 12 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Fresno State | W 52-17 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas State | W 31-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 11 | 38.6 | 12.7 | 10 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 11 | 38.6 | 12.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Central Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#3
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.7 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.6 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 35.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Toledo
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.4
#2
2016 Postseason · Toledo
29
11 primary · 38.6 efficiency · 12.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Toledo
29
11 primary · 38.6 efficiency · 12.7 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8019
Chandler · Chandler, AZ
- Committed To
- Michigan State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
94
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.