Usage Score
5.1
Player Dossier
2013-2017Toledo
WR • 6'3" • 195 lbs • Chagrin Falls, OH, USA
Darryl Richards reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.1
Efficiency
71.1
Consistency
57.4
Season Value
58.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darryl Richards, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Toledo. Darryl Richards reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Darryl Richards played WR for Toledo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Darryl Richards recorded 151 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Toledo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Toledo paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
15
Efficiency
71.1
Usage
5.1
Consistency
57.4
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 9. Eastern Michigan: 4. Northern Illinois: 31. Bowling Green: 23. Western Michigan: 6. Akron: 17
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 60. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 26.7. Northern Illinois: 1 by 100. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 1 by 40. Akron: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 40 | 100 | 10 | 40 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 21 | 70 | 3.8 | -19 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 90 | 71.1 | 5.1 | 69 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40
Primary metric
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
11
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
BYU
10
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2015 Regular Season · Toledo
63.5
40 primary · 100 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Toledo
58.1
90 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 5.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.7683
Park City · Park City, UT
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
151
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.