Usage Score
28.5
Player Dossier
2013-2016Toledo
Rodney Adams
WR • 6'1" • St. Petersburg, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Rodney Adams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.7
Consistency
73.8
Season Value
65.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Florida
131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo • South Florida
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rodney Adams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · South Florida. Rodney Adams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
South Florida paired 822 primary output with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Toledo, South Florida.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · South Florida
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
63.2
Efficiency
73.7
Usage
28.5
Consistency
73.8
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 67. Unknown: 20. Northern Illinois: 66. Syracuse: 67. Florida State: 84. Cincinnati: 66. East Carolina: 113. UConn: 43. Temple: 43. Navy: 54. Memphis: 115. SMU: 6. UCF: 78
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 7 by 63.8. Unknown: 2 by 66.7. Northern Illinois: 5 by 88. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Florida State: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 6 by 73.3. East Carolina: 7 by 100. UConn: 7 by 41. Temple: 2 by 100. Navy: 7 by 51.4. Memphis: 8 by 95.8. SMU: 2 by 20. UCF: 9 by 57.8
Split Comparison
Wins67.5 · n=10 · +4 vs Losses
Losses63.5 · n=2 · -4 vs Wins
First Half69 · n=7 · +12.5 vs Second Half
Second Half56.5 · n=6 · -12.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ South Carolina | W 46-39 | — | 7 | 67 | 9.3 | 9.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs UCFHigh volume | W 48-31 | — | 9 | 78 | 8.5 | 8.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ SMU | W 35-27 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-42 | — | 8 | 115 | 18.3 | 14.40 | 1 | 49 |
| Fri 10/28 | vs Navy | W 52-45 | — | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 10/21 | @ Temple | L 30-46 | — | 2 | 43 | 13.7 | 21.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UConn | W 42-27 | — | 7 | 43 | 5.6 | 6.10 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards | W 38-22 | — | 7 | 113 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Cincinnati | W 45-20 | — | 6 | 66 | 9.7 | 11 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Florida State | L 35-55 | — | 1 | 84 | 43.5 | 84 | 1 | 84 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Syracuse | W 45-20 | — | 4 | 67 | 12.6 | 16.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Northern Illinois | W 48-17 | — | 5 | 66 | 11.8 | 13.20 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 20 | 9.5 | 10 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2013
Opening stop
- 2
South Florida
2014-2016
Final stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 15 | 50 | 4 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | South Florida | 323 | 65.7 | 19.5 | 308 |
| 2015 Postseason | South Florida | 822 | 78.6 | 27.9 | 499 |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Florida | 822 | 78.6 | 27.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | South Florida | 822 | 73.7 | 28.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Florida | 822 | 73.7 | 28.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147
Primary metric
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 95.8 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
67
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · South Florida
822 primary output · 73.7 efficiency · 28.5 usage
65.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · South Florida
65.1
822 primary · 73.7 efficiency · 28.5 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · South Florida
62.4
822 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 27.9 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8858
Lakewood · St. Petersburg, FL
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,982
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.