Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Penn State paired 2,883 primary output with 49.5 efficiency.
Player Stats
Christian Hackenberg College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 8,215
- Passing yards
- 8,457
- Touchdowns
- 55
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Penn State | 12 | 2,887 | 2,955 | -68 | 24 | 64.9 |
| 2014 Postseason | Penn State | 13 | 371 | 371 | 0 | 4 | 66.2 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Penn State | 13 | 2,512 | 2,606 | -94 | 8 | 66.2 |
| 2015 Postseason | Penn State | 13 | 143 | 139 | 4 | 0 | 60.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 13 | 2,302 | 2,386 | -84 | 19 | 60.5 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 53.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with 283 yards of offense and 58.3 efficiency. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Penn State
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
188.1
Efficiency
53.9
Usage
17
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 143. Temple: 44. Buffalo: 132. Rutgers: 144. San Diego State: 290. Army: 159. Indiana: 283. Ohio State: 104. Maryland: 299. Illinois: 249. Northwestern: 210. Michigan: 134. Michigan State: 254
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 15 by 62.8. Temple: 36 by 40.6. Buffalo: 29 by 52.8. Rutgers: 21 by 52.1. San Diego State: 38 by 57.6. Army: 24 by 56.8. Indiana: 48 by 58.3. Ohio State: 20 by 57.7. Maryland: 34 by 58.8. Illinois: 33 by 62.2. Northwestern: 45 by 48.8. Michigan: 37 by 44.7. Michigan State: 45 by 47.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins222.3 · Games = 7 · +74.1 vs Losses
Losses148.2 · Games = 6 · -74.1 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Christian Hackenberg
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.