Usage Score
2.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Penn State
DT • 6'4" • 304 lbs • Huntsville, AL, USA
Parker Cothren shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
2.4
Efficiency
11.2
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
11.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Parker Cothren, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Penn State. Parker Cothren shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.2 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Penn State paired 7.5 primary output with 15.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 11.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
11.2
Usage
2.4
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 1. Akron: 0.5. Pittsburgh: 0. Georgia State: 0. Iowa: 0. Indiana: 0. Northwestern: 0. Michigan: 2. Ohio State: 0. Michigan State: 0. Rutgers: 0. Nebraska: 0.5. Maryland: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 1 by 14.2. Akron: 1 by 9.2. Pittsburgh: 2 by 8.3. Georgia State: 2 by 8.3. Iowa: 1 by 4.2. Northwestern: 3 by 12.5. Michigan: 4 by 36.7. Ohio State: 1 by 4.2. Michigan State: 3 by 12.5. Rutgers: 2 by 8.3. Nebraska: 1 by 9.2. Maryland: 2 by 18.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
36.7 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | vs Washington | W 35-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Maryland | W 66-3 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Nebraska | W 56-44 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Rutgers | W 35-6 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Michigan State | L 24-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Ohio State | L 38-39 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Michigan | W 42-13 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Northwestern | W 31-7 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Indiana | W 45-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Iowa | W 21-19 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Georgia State | W 56-0 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Pittsburgh | W 33-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Akron | W 52-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Penn State | 7.5 | 15.3 | 3.9 | 7.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Penn State | 7.5 | 15.3 | 3.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Penn State | 5 | 11.2 | 2.4 | -2.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Penn State | 5 | 11.2 | 2.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.2 takeover score.
#2
Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.
#3
Michigan State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 32.8 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.3 takeover score.
#5
Washington
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Penn State
7.5 primary output · 15.3 efficiency · 3.9 usage
19.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Penn State
19.8
7.5 primary · 15.3 efficiency · 3.9 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Penn State
11.6
5 primary · 11.2 efficiency · 2.4 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8328
Hazel Green · Hazel Green, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
49
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Parker Cothren quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit