Usage Score
27.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Oregon State
Victor Bolden Jr.
WR • 5'9" • Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Victor Bolden Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.8
Consistency
52.5
Season Value
50.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Oregon State
1313141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Oregon State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Victor Bolden Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Oregon State. Victor Bolden Jr. reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Oregon State paired 798 primary output with 68.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Oregon State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.2
Efficiency
64.8
Usage
27.1
Consistency
52.5
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 32. Unknown: 56. Boise State: 43. Colorado: 13. California: 28. Utah: 25. Washington: 58. Washington State: 113. Stanford: 109. UCLA: 51. Arizona: 0. Oregon: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 5 by 42.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Boise State: 6 by 47.8. Colorado: 2 by 43.3. California: 4 by 46.7. Utah: 3 by 55.6. Washington: 5 by 77.3. Washington State: 7 by 100. Stanford: 4 by 100. UCLA: 5 by 68. Oregon: 3 by 31.1
Split Comparison
Wins14 · n=3 · -41.5 vs Losses
Losses55.5 · n=8 · +41.5 vs Wins
First Half32.8 · n=6 · -24.7 vs Second Half
Second Half57.5 · n=6 · +24.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs Oregon | W 34-24 | — | 3 | 14 | 3.8 | 4.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Arizona | W 42-17 | — | — | — | -5 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ UCLA | L 24-38 | — | 5 | 51 | 7.1 | 10.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards | L 15-26 | — | 4 | 109 | 22.4 | 27.30 | 1 | 75 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Washington State100 receiving yards | L 31-35 | — | 7 | 113 | 14 | 16.10 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Washington | L 17-41 | — | 5 | 58 | 19 | 11.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Utah | L 14-19 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.6 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs California | W 47-44 | — | 4 | 28 | 9.3 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Colorado | L 6-47 | — | 2 | 13 | 7.7 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Boise State | L 24-38 | — | 6 | 43 | 5.3 | 7.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 56 | 33.4 | 28 | 0 | 48 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Minnesota | L 23-30 | — | 5 | 32 | 5.3 | 6.40 | 1 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon State
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Oregon State | 62 | 65.8 | 5 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Oregon State | 62 | 65.8 | 5 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Oregon State | 798 | 68.8 | 25.3 | 736 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oregon State | 461 | 70 | 28 | -337 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oregon State | 542 | 64.8 | 27.1 | 81 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Stanford
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109
Primary metric
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington State
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington
145
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 87.8 efficiency score.
#5
Washington State
126
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Oregon State
798 primary output · 68.8 efficiency · 25.3 usage
61.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · Oregon State
55.5
461 primary · 70 efficiency · 28 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Oregon State
50.8
542 primary · 64.8 efficiency · 27.1 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8375
Los Osos · Rancho Cucamonga, CA
- Committed To
- Oregon State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,863
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.