Usage Score
4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Arizona
DL • 6'4" • 305 lbs • Oak Park, CA, USA
Luca Bruno shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
4
Efficiency
14.4
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
12.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arizona
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Luca Bruno, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arizona. Luca Bruno shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.4 disruption score.
Luca Bruno played DL for Arizona. Across 5 tracked seasons, Luca Bruno recorded 38 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Arizona.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Arizona paired 5 primary output with 14.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 14.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
14.4
Usage
4
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 0. Unknown: 0. Houston: 0. UTEP: 1. Utah: 0. Colorado: 0. California: 1. Washington State: 0. USC: 2. Oregon State: 1. Oregon: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Houston: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 1 by 14.2. Utah: 1 by 4.2. Colorado: 3 by 12.5. California: 5 by 30.8. Washington State: 1 by 4.2. USC: 3 by 32.5. Oregon State: 2 by 18.3. Oregon: 3 by 12.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
32.5 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | @ Purdue | L 35-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | @ Oregon | L 28-48 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Oregon State | W 49-28 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | @ USC | L 35-49 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | vs Washington State | W 58-37 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/22 | @ California | W 45-44 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Colorado | W 45-42 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Utah | L 24-30 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ UTEP | W 63-16 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Houston | L 16-19 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 1 | 8.6 | 2.1 | 1 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona | 5 | 14.4 | 4 | 4 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 5 | 14.4 | 4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
USC
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.5 takeover score.
#2
Arizona State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.6 takeover score.
#3
California
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 29.6 takeover score.
#4
Oregon State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.4 takeover score.
#5
UTEP
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 21.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Arizona
5 primary output · 14.4 efficiency · 4 usage
12.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Arizona
12.4
5 primary · 14.4 efficiency · 4 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Arizona
4.8
1 primary · 8.6 efficiency · 2.1 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8333
Oak Park · Oak Park, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
38
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.