Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2013-2016Georgia Tech
Harrison Butker
PK • 6'3" • Decatur, GA, USA
Impact contributor
Harrison Butker shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Georgia Tech
13131414151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Georgia Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Harrison Butker, PK. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Georgia Tech. Harrison Butker shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Harrison Butker is listed as a PK for Georgia Tech. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Georgia Tech
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 0. Boston College: 0. Unknown: 0. Vanderbilt: 0. Clemson: 0. Miami: 0. Pittsburgh: 0. Georgia Southern: 0. Duke: 0. North Carolina: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Virginia: 0. Georgia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 8 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 4 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
— vs Kentucky
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Kentucky | W 33-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Georgia | W 28-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Virginia | W 31-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Virginia Tech | W 30-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ North Carolina | L 20-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Duke | W 38-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Georgia Southern | W 35-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Pittsburgh | L 34-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Miami | L 21-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 9/22 | vs Clemson | L 7-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Vanderbilt | W 38-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Boston College | W 17-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Tech
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201320142014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0
Primary metric
0 primary-metric impact.
#2
Georgia
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
Unknown
0
Primary metric
Game with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
Clemson
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Pittsburgh
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Georgia Tech
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2013 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Georgia Tech
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8383
Westminster School · Atlanta, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.