Usage Score
9.2
Player Dossier
2013-2016Alabama
Tim Williams
LB • 6'4" • Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tim Williams shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.5
Consistency
63.6
Season Value
49.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Alabama
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tim Williams, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Alabama. Tim Williams shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Alabama paired 27 primary output with 28.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Alabama
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.9
Efficiency
28.5
Usage
9.2
Consistency
63.6
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 0. Washington: 1. USC: 0. Ole Miss: 2. Kent State: 1. Kentucky: 4. Arkansas: 3. Tennessee: 3. Texas A&M: 4. LSU: 2. Mississippi State: 3. Unknown: 1. Auburn: 2. Florida: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. Washington: 2 by 18.3. USC: 2 by 8.3. Ole Miss: 2 by 28.3. Kent State: 2 by 18.3. Kentucky: 4 by 56.7. Arkansas: 1 by 34.2. Tennessee: 2 by 38.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 52.5. LSU: 4 by 36.7. Mississippi State: 3 by 42.5. Unknown: 1 by 14.2. Auburn: 1 by 24.2. Florida: 2 by 18.3
Split Comparison
Wins2.2 · n=12
First Half1.6 · n=7 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half2.3 · n=7 · +0.7 vs First Half
All Games1.9 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
56.7 vs Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | vs Clemson | L 31-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/31 | vs Washington | W 24-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Florida | W 54-16 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Auburn | W 30-12 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Mississippi StateSplash game | W 51-3 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/6 | @ LSU | W 10-0 | 4 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Texas A&M2+ sacks · Splash game | W 33-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ TennesseeSplash game | W 49-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Arkansas | W 49-30 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs KentuckySplash game | W 34-6 | 4 | 4 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Kent State | W 48-0 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Ole Miss | W 48-43 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs USC | W 52-6 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Alabama | 27 | 28.5 | 9.2 | 27 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 27 | 28.5 | 9.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.4 takeover score.
#2
Texas A&M
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#3
Mississippi State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 44.4 takeover score.
#4
Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 42.1 takeover score.
#5
Arkansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 38.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Alabama
27 primary output · 28.5 efficiency · 9.2 usage
49.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Alabama
49.4
27 primary · 28.5 efficiency · 9.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Alabama
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9619
University Lab · Baton Rouge, LA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
31
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.