Usage Score
27.6
Player Dossier
2013-2016Alabama
WR • 6'1" • Fultondale, AL, USA
ArDarius Stewart reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27.6
Efficiency
81.5
Consistency
60.3
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
ArDarius Stewart, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Alabama. ArDarius Stewart reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
ArDarius Stewart played WR for Alabama. Across 4 tracked seasons, ArDarius Stewart recorded 36 passing yards, 82 rushing yards, and 1,713 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Alabama.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Alabama paired 864 primary output with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
72
Efficiency
81.5
Usage
27.6
Consistency
60.3
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 12. Washington: 0. USC: 113. Western Kentucky: 90. Ole Miss: 2. Arkansas: 120. Tennessee: 90. Texas A&M: 57. LSU: 55. Mississippi State: 156. Auburn: 127. Florida: 42
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 40. USC: 4 by 100. Western Kentucky: 5 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 3.3. Arkansas: 5 by 100. Tennessee: 8 by 75. Texas A&M: 2 by 100. LSU: 3 by 100. Mississippi State: 8 by 100. Auburn: 10 by 84.7. Florida: 3 by 93.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/10 | vs Clemson | L 31-35 | — | 2 | 12 | 12.3 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 12/31 | vs Washington | W 24-7 | — | — | — | 5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | @ Florida | W 54-16 | — | 3 | 42 | 10.5 | 14 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-12 | — | 10 | 127 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-3 | — | 8 | 156 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 3 | 67 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ LSU | W 10-0 | — | 3 | 55 | 14.8 | 18.30 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Texas A&M | W 33-14 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ TennesseeHigh volume | W 49-10 | — | 8 | 90 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Arkansas100 receiving yards | W 49-30 | — | 5 | 120 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 67 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Ole Miss | W 48-43 | — | 4 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Western Kentucky | W 38-10 | — | 5 | 90 | 14.6 | 18 | 1 | 52 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs USC100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 52-6 | — | 4 | 113 | 26 | 28.30 | 2 | 71 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 149 | 63.6 | 9.7 | 149 |
| 2015 Postseason | Alabama | 700 | 72.1 | 20.9 | 551 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 700 | 72.1 | 20.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Alabama | 864 | 81.5 | 27.6 | 164 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 864 | 81.5 | 27.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156
Primary metric
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tennessee
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 67.5 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Alabama
864 primary output · 81.5 efficiency · 27.6 usage
66.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Alabama
66.2
864 primary · 81.5 efficiency · 27.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Alabama
60.3
700 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 20.9 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9625
Fultondale · Birmingham, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,713
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.