Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2013-2017Alabama
Robert Foster
WR • 6'2" • 194 lbs • Monaca, PA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Robert Foster reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
58.4
Consistency
54.9
Season Value
56
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Alabama
131415161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Robert Foster, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Alabama. Robert Foster reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Alabama paired 116 primary output with 73.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Alabama
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
17.4
Efficiency
58.4
Usage
10.6
Consistency
54.9
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 28. Fresno State: 23. Colorado State: 52. Vanderbilt: -5. Ole Miss: 25. Texas A&M: 1. LSU: 23. Mississippi State: 0. Unknown: 24. Auburn: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 3 by 62.2. Fresno State: 2 by 76.7. Colorado State: 1 by 100. Vanderbilt: 1 by 0. Ole Miss: 2 by 83.3. Texas A&M: 1 by 6.7. LSU: 2 by 76.7. Unknown: 1 by 100. Auburn: 1 by 20
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins18.4 · Games = 8
First Half24.6 · Games = 5 · +14.4 vs Second Half
Second Half10.2 · Games = 5 · -14.4 vs First Half
All Games17.4 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/9 | @ Georgia | W 26-23 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Auburn | L 14-26 | — | 1 | 3 | 7.5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Mississippi State | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | vs LSU | W 24-10 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Texas A&M | W 27-19 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun 10/1 | vs Ole Miss | W 66-3 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Vanderbilt | W 59-0 | — | 1 | -5 | -5 | -5 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Colorado State | W 41-23 | — | 1 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Fresno State | W 41-10 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 44 | 31.1 | 7.8 | 44 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 116 | 73.9 | 13.3 | 72 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Alabama | 45 | 64.5 | 10 | -71 |
| 2017 Postseason | Alabama | 174 | 58.4 | 10.6 | 129 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Alabama | 174 | 58.4 | 10.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado State
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
49
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
40
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Alabama
116 primary output · 73.9 efficiency · 13.3 usage
58.7
#2
2017 Postseason · Alabama
56
174 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 10.6 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Alabama
56
174 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.9896
Central Valley · Monaca, PA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
379
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.