Usage Score
46.6
Player Profile
Jamir Tillman
WR • 6'4" • Las Vegas, NV, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jamir Tillman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.6
Consistency
64.4
Season Value
74
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Navy
131415151616
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Navy
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Navy
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Jamir Tillman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Navy. Jamir Tillman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Navy paired 631 primary output with 85.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Navy
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
48.5
Efficiency
85.6
Usage
46.6
Consistency
64.4
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 16. Unknown: 21. UConn: 75. Tulane: 47. Air Force: 128. Memphis: 15. South Florida: 76. Notre Dame: 41. Tulsa: 56. East Carolina: 66. SMU: 8. Temple: 49. Army: 33
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 53.3. Unknown: 2 by 70. UConn: 4 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 100. Air Force: 9 by 94.8. Memphis: 1 by 100. South Florida: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 68.3. Tulsa: 2 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 100. SMU: 1 by 53.3. Temple: 3 by 100. Army: 3 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins44 · n=7 · -16.4 vs Losses
Losses60.4 · n=5 · +16.4 vs Wins
First Half54 · n=7 · +11.8 vs Second Half
Second Half42.2 · n=6 · -11.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 45-48 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 12/10 | @ Army | L 17-21 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Temple | L 10-34 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ SMU | W 75-31 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ East Carolina | W 66-31 | — | 2 | 66 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Tulsa | W 42-40 | — | 2 | 56 | 21.3 | 28 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Notre Dame | W 28-27 | — | 4 | 41 | 9.4 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 10/28 | @ South Florida | L 45-52 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Memphis | W 42-28 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-28 | — | 9 | 128 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Tulane | W 21-14 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UConn | W 28-24 | — | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Navy | 12 | 40 | 11.3 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Navy | 386 | 87.1 | 34.8 | 374 |
| 2015 Postseason | Navy | 597 | 79.1 | 55.2 | 211 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Navy | 597 | 79.1 | 55.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Navy | 631 | 85.6 | 46.6 | 34 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Navy | 631 | 85.6 | 46.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128
Primary metric
128 receiving yards with a 94.8 efficiency score.
#2
Army
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
67
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
162
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Navy
631 primary output · 85.6 efficiency · 46.6 usage
74
#2
2016 Regular Season · Navy
74
631 primary · 85.6 efficiency · 46.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Navy
67
597 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 55.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.81
Bishop Gorman · Las Vegas, NV
- Committed To
- Navy
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,626
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.