Usage Score
13.1
Player Dossier
2013-2016Kentucky
Jojo Kemp
RB • 5'10" • DeLand, FL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Jojo Kemp leans balanced backfield option traits and 53 efficiency.
Efficiency
53
Consistency
55.7
Season Value
45.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Kentucky
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Kentucky
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jojo Kemp, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Kentucky. Jojo Kemp leans balanced backfield option traits and 53 efficiency.
Jojo Kemp played RB for Kentucky. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jojo Kemp recorded 14 passing yards, 1,709 rushing yards, and 85 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Kentucky.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Kentucky paired 538 primary output with 52.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Kentucky
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
35.4
Efficiency
53
Usage
13.1
Consistency
55.7
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 28. Southern Miss: 11. Florida: 13. South Carolina: 16. Alabama: 39. Vanderbilt: 56. Mississippi State: 15. Tennessee: 90. Unknown: 54. Louisville: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 3 by 88.9. Southern Miss: 6 by 16.4. Florida: 8 by 16.9. South Carolina: 4 by 41.7. Alabama: 10 by 40.6. Vanderbilt: 13 by 46.6. Mississippi State: 2 by 78.1. Tennessee: 8 by 96.9. Unknown: 8 by 70.3. Louisville: 10 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins29.8 · Games = 4 · -6.5 vs Losses
Losses36.2 · Games = 5 · +6.5 vs Wins
First Half21.4 · Games = 5 · -28 vs Second Half
Second Half49.4 · Games = 5 · +28 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
96.9 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs Georgia Tech | L 18-33 | 3 | 28 | 9.30 | 0 | — | — | 9.3 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Louisville | W 41-38 | 10 | 32 | 3.20 | 0 | — | — | 3.2 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | 8 | 54 | 6.80 | 2 | — | — | 6.8 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Tennessee | L 36-49 | 8 | 90 | 11.30 | 1 | — | — | 11.3 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Mississippi State | W 40-38 | 2 | 15 | 7.50 | 0 | — | — | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Vanderbilt | W 20-13 | 12 | 55 | 4.60 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Alabama | L 6-34 | 10 | 39 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs South Carolina | W 17-10 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Florida | L 7-45 | 8 | 13 | 1.60 | 1 | — | — | 1.6 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Southern Miss | L 35-44 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kentucky
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Kentucky | 538 | 52.6 | 17.1 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kentucky | 335 | 34.1 | 12 | -203 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kentucky | 567 | 48.2 | 16.6 | 232 |
| 2016 Postseason | Kentucky | 354 | 53 | 13.1 | -213 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kentucky | 354 | 53 | 13.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Win with 165 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
165
Primary metric
165 scrimmage yards and 19 usage.
#2
Louisville
91
Primary metric
Loss with 91 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
91 scrimmage yards and 12.5 usage.
#3
South Carolina
128
Primary metric
Win with 128 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
128 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#4
Tennessee
90
Primary metric
Loss with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
90 scrimmage yards and 11.9 usage.
#5
Miami (OH)
78
Primary metric
Win with 78 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
78 scrimmage yards and 19 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Kentucky
538 primary output · 52.6 efficiency · 17.1 usage
56.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Kentucky
53.4
567 primary · 48.2 efficiency · 16.6 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Kentucky
45.9
354 primary · 53 efficiency · 13.1 usage
Milestones
2
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8204
ProKick Australia · Australia, AUST
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,794
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.