Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Kentucky paired 670 primary output with 90.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Kentucky | 8 | 22 | 285 | 1 | 56.2 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kentucky | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kentucky | 11 | 29 | 430 | 2 | 66.1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Kentucky | 13 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 76.9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kentucky | 13 | 28 | 639 | 4 | 76.9 |
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma | 14 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 49.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 14 | 25 | 396 | 3 | 49.1 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Kentucky paired 670 primary output with 90.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
28.6
Efficiency
72.8
Usage
10
Consistency
30.6
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 4. UTEP: 91. Ohio State: 82. Tulane: 13. Baylor: 57. Iowa State: 19. Texas: 59. Kansas State: 42. Texas Tech: 0. Oklahoma State: 5. TCU: 0. Kansas: 20. West Virginia: 8. TCU: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 1 by 26.7. UTEP: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 5 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 86.7. Baylor: 2 by 100. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Texas: 2 by 100. Kansas State: 5 by 56. Oklahoma State: 1 by 33.3. Kansas: 3 by 44.4. West Virginia: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.