Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2013-2017Kentucky
WR • 6'0" • 178 lbs • Orlando, FL, USA
Jeff Badet reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10
Efficiency
72.8
Consistency
30.6
Season Value
43.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Badet, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Kentucky. Jeff Badet reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Kentucky paired 670 primary output with 90.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
28.6
Efficiency
72.8
Usage
10
Consistency
30.6
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 4. UTEP: 91. Ohio State: 82. Tulane: 13. Baylor: 57. Iowa State: 19. Texas: 59. Kansas State: 42. Texas Tech: 0. Oklahoma State: 5. TCU: 0. Kansas: 20. West Virginia: 8. TCU: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 1 by 26.7. UTEP: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 5 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 86.7. Baylor: 2 by 100. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Texas: 2 by 100. Kansas State: 5 by 56. Oklahoma State: 1 by 33.3. Kansas: 3 by 44.4. West Virginia: 1 by 53.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Georgia | L 48-54 | — | 1 | 4 | 6.5 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 12/2 | vs TCU | W 41-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs West Virginia | W 59-31 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Kansas | W 41-3 | — | 3 | 20 | 5.3 | 6.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs TCU | W 38-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Oklahoma State | W 62-52 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Sun 10/29 | vs Texas Tech | W 49-27 | — | — | — | 24 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Kansas State | W 42-35 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Texas | W 29-24 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Iowa State | L 31-38 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Baylor | W 49-41 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Tulane | W 56-14 | — | 1 | 13 | 7.5 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Ohio State | W 31-16 | — | 5 | 82 | 12.4 | 16.40 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs UTEP | W 56-7 | — | 4 | 91 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 0 | 51 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kentucky
2013-2016
Opening stop
Oklahoma
2017
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Kentucky | 285 | 72.1 | 14.8 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kentucky | 0 | — | — | -285 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kentucky | 430 | 82.4 | 13.9 | 430 |
| 2016 Postseason | Kentucky | 670 | 90.2 | 19.2 | 240 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kentucky | 670 | 90.2 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma | 400 | 72.8 | 10 | -270 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 400 | 72.8 | 10 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139
Primary metric
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Miami (OH)
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Carolina
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Kentucky
670 primary output · 90.2 efficiency · 19.2 usage
65.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Kentucky
65.7
670 primary · 90.2 efficiency · 19.2 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Kentucky
58
430 primary · 82.4 efficiency · 13.9 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8461
Freedom · Orlando, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,785
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jeff Badet quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit