Usage Score
6.3
Player Dossier
2013-2017Troy
WR • 6'3" • 221 lbs • Enterprise, AL, USA
Clark Quisenberry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.3
Efficiency
69
Consistency
75
Season Value
54.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Troy
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Clark Quisenberry, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Troy. Clark Quisenberry reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Troy paired 138 primary output with 63.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 69 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
13.7
Efficiency
69
Usage
6.3
Consistency
75
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boise State: 15. New Mexico State: 11. Akron: 25. South Alabama: 6. Georgia Southern: 6. Coastal Carolina: 14. Texas State: 19
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boise State: 1 by 100. New Mexico State: 1 by 73.3. Akron: 2 by 83.3. South Alabama: 1 by 40. Georgia Southern: 1 by 40. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 46.7. Texas State: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Troy
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Troy | 44 | 78.4 | 6.8 | 44 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Troy | 138 | 63.2 | 8.9 | 94 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | -138 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Troy | 96 | 69 | 6.3 | 96 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27
Primary metric
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia Southern
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Alabama
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
Texas State
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Troy
138 primary output · 63.2 efficiency · 8.9 usage
61.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · Troy
54.9
96 primary · 69 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Troy
48.1
44 primary · 78.4 efficiency · 6.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7693
Enterprise · Enterprise, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
278
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Clark Quisenberry quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit