Player Stats

Josh Anderson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
992
Rushing yards
796
Receiving yards
196
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonTroy00000-
2014 Regular SeasonTroy6714328134.2
2015 Regular SeasonTroy429290027.8
2016 PostseasonTroy1346-2047.7
2016 Regular SeasonTroy1334927475447.7
2017 PostseasonTroy131191136258.3
2017 Regular SeasonTroy1342033189458.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Troy paired 539 primary output with 42.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 42.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Troy

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

41.5

Efficiency

42.8

Usage

15.6

Consistency

46

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 119. Boise State: -3. Alabama State: 41. New Mexico State: 26. Akron: 2. LSU: 5. South Alabama: 36. Georgia State: 77. Georgia Southern: 96. Idaho: 21. Coastal Carolina: 58. Texas State: 29. Arkansas State: 32

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 23 by 53.7. Boise State: 3 by 0. Alabama State: 7 by 66.9. New Mexico State: 5 by 54.2. Akron: 1 by 20.8. LSU: 2 by 26. South Alabama: 6 by 45.8. Georgia State: 15 by 48.8. Georgia Southern: 15 by 66.7. Idaho: 6 by 36.5. Coastal Carolina: 9 by 67.1. Texas State: 7 by 39.8. Arkansas State: 7 by 30

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins46 · Games = 11 · +29.5 vs Losses
Losses16.5 · Games = 2 · -29.5 vs Wins