Usage Score
15.2
Player Dossier
2013-2017New Mexico
QB • 6'0" • 192 lbs • Frisco, TX, USA
Lamar Jordan is a balanced quarterback profile with 15.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
15.2
Efficiency
48.7
Consistency
36.3
Season Value
39.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · New Mexico
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lamar Jordan, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · New Mexico. Lamar Jordan is a balanced quarterback profile with 15.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lamar Jordan played QB for New Mexico. Across 5 tracked seasons, Lamar Jordan recorded 3,225 passing yards, 2,501 rushing yards, and 37 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with New Mexico.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
New Mexico paired 1,852 primary output with 64.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 48.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
86.1
Efficiency
48.7
Usage
15.2
Consistency
36.3
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 265. New Mexico State: 95. Boise State: 32. Air Force: 214. Fresno State: 13. Colorado State: 50. Wyoming: 28. Utah State: 106. Texas A&M: 16. UNLV: 116. San Diego State: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 24 by 84.7. New Mexico State: 23 by 38.9. Boise State: 11 by 55.6. Air Force: 19 by 78.1. Fresno State: 10 by 37.8. Colorado State: 5 by 69.2. Wyoming: 15 by 14.1. Utah State: 22 by 62.2. Texas A&M: 12 by 29.3. UNLV: 17 by 22.3. San Diego State: 12 by 43.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
84.7 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | @ San Diego State | L 10-35 | 6 | 10 | 11 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 43.5 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs UNLVDual-threat | L 35-38 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 22.3 | 13 | 116 | 8.90 | 2 | 41 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-55 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 44.4 | 0 | 1 | 29.3 | 3 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Utah StateDual-threat | L 10-24 | 4 | 6 | 21 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 62.2 | 16 | 85 | 5.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Wyoming | L 3-42 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 25.0 | 0 | 2 | 14.1 | 7 | 6 | 0.90 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Colorado State | L 24-27 | 2 | 3 | 48 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 69.2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ Fresno State | L 0-38 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 37.8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Air ForceDual-threat | W 56-38 | 4 | 9 | 146 | 44.4 | 2 | 0 | 78.1 | 10 | 68 | 6.80 | 0 | 39 |
| Fri 9/15 | @ Boise State | L 14-28 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 55.6 | 9 | 20 | 2.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/10 | vs New Mexico State | L 28-30 | 10 | 19 | 103 | 52.6 | 0 | 2 | 38.9 | 4 | -8 | -2 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs UnknownDual-threat | — | 11 | 17 | 213 | 64.7 | 1 | 0 | 84.7 | 7 | 52 | 7.40 | 0 | 27 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
New Mexico
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | New Mexico | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | New Mexico | 1,507 | 63.4 | 23.2 | 1,507 |
| 2015 Postseason | New Mexico | 1,852 | 64.1 | 24.3 | 345 |
| 2015 Regular Season | New Mexico | 1,852 | 64.1 | 24.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | New Mexico | 1,420 | 60.4 | 17.3 | -432 |
| 2016 Regular Season | New Mexico | 1,420 | 60.4 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | New Mexico | 947 | 48.7 | 15.2 | -473 |
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
254
Primary metric
254 total offense with 90.1 efficiency.
#2
Wyoming
298
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
298 total offense with 95 efficiency.
#3
Utah State
234
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
234 total offense with 57.1 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
265
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
265 total offense with 84.7 efficiency.
#5
Wyoming
217
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
217 total offense with 78.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · New Mexico
1,852 primary output · 64.1 efficiency · 24.3 usage
66.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · New Mexico
66.3
1,852 primary · 64.1 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · New Mexico
63.7
1,507 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 23.2 usage
3
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
26
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7993
Centennial · Frisco, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
5,726
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.