Usage Score
28.9
Player Dossier
2013-2016New Mexico
Dameon Gamblin
WR • 5'10" • Mesquite, TX, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Dameon Gamblin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
62
Consistency
31.6
Season Value
44.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · New Mexico
131415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- New Mexico
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dameon Gamblin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · New Mexico. Dameon Gamblin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
New Mexico paired 424 primary output with 71.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 62 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · New Mexico
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
23.1
Efficiency
62
Usage
28.9
Consistency
31.6
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 34. Unknown: 20. New Mexico State: 47. Rutgers: 11. Boise State: 3. Air Force: 0. UL Monroe: 10. Hawai'i: 41. Nevada: 8. Utah State: 4. Colorado State: 76
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 1 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 33.3. New Mexico State: 4 by 78.3. Rutgers: 1 by 73.3. Boise State: 1 by 20. UL Monroe: 1 by 66.7. Hawai'i: 4 by 68.3. Nevada: 1 by 53.3. Utah State: 1 by 26.7. Colorado State: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins16.2 · n=6 · -18.1 vs Losses
Losses34.3 · n=4 · +18.1 vs Wins
First Half19.2 · n=6 · -8.6 vs Second Half
Second Half27.8 · n=5 · +8.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado State
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/17 | @ UTSA | W 23-20 | — | 1 | 34 | 16 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Colorado State2+ TD | L 31-49 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 2 | 24 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Utah State | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 4 | 4.5 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Nevada | W 35-26 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Hawai'i | W 28-21 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs UL Monroe | W 59-17 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Air Force | W 45-40 | — | — | — | 14 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Boise State | L 21-49 | — | 1 | 3 | 1.3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Rutgers | L 28-37 | — | 1 | 11 | 6.5 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/11 | @ New Mexico State | L 31-32 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
New Mexico
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | New Mexico | -3 | 0 | 11.1 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | New Mexico | 35 | 55.5 | 15.1 | 38 |
| 2015 Postseason | New Mexico | 424 | 71.7 | 31.2 | 389 |
| 2015 Regular Season | New Mexico | 424 | 71.7 | 31.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | New Mexico | 254 | 62 | 28.9 | -170 |
| 2016 Regular Season | New Mexico | 254 | 62 | 28.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
131
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Boise State
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico State
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · New Mexico
424 primary output · 71.7 efficiency · 31.2 usage
57.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · New Mexico
57.9
424 primary · 71.7 efficiency · 31.2 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · New Mexico
44.7
254 primary · 62 efficiency · 28.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7633
Mesquite · Mesquite, TX
- Committed To
- New Mexico
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
710
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.