Usage Score
8.1
Player Dossier
2013-2015Notre Dame
Corey Robinson
WR • 6'4" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Corey Robinson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.6
Consistency
55.7
Season Value
44
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame
1313141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Robinson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Corey Robinson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 539 primary output with 85.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
18.2
Efficiency
75.6
Usage
8.1
Consistency
55.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 41. Texas: 35. Virginia: 11. Georgia Tech: -1. Clemson: 15. Navy: 28. USC: 10. Pittsburgh: 12. Wake Forest: 4. Boston College: 15. Stanford: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 3 by 91.1. Texas: 2 by 100. Virginia: 1 by 73.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 0. Clemson: 1 by 100. Navy: 2 by 93.3. USC: 1 by 66.7. Pittsburgh: 1 by 80. Wake Forest: 1 by 26.7. Boston College: 1 by 100. Stanford: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins14.3 · n=8 · -14.4 vs Losses
Losses28.7 · n=3 · +14.4 vs Wins
First Half21.5 · n=6 · +7.3 vs Second Half
Second Half14.2 · n=5 · -7.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Ohio State | L 28-44 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Stanford | L 36-38 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Boston College | W 19-16 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Wake Forest | W 28-7 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-30 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs USC | W 41-31 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Navy | W 41-24 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ Clemson | L 22-24 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Georgia Tech | W 30-22 | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Virginia | W 34-27 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Texas | W 38-3 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Notre Dame | 157 | 90.6 | 8.9 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 157 | 90.6 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 539 | 85.7 | 14.6 | 382 |
| 2015 Postseason | Notre Dame | 200 | 75.6 | 8.1 | -339 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 200 | 75.6 | 8.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54
Primary metric
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida State
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio State
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#4
Texas
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Syracuse
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 75.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Notre Dame
539 primary output · 85.7 efficiency · 14.6 usage
64.5
#2
2013 Postseason · Notre Dame
47
157 primary · 90.6 efficiency · 8.9 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Notre Dame
47
157 primary · 90.6 efficiency · 8.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.885
Christian Academy · San Antonio, TX
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
896
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.