Usage Score
52.8
Player Dossier
2013-2016Army
Edgar Poe
WR • 6'4" • Tucson, AZ, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Edgar Poe reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92.5
Consistency
41
Season Value
65.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Army
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Edgar Poe, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Army. Edgar Poe reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Army paired 441 primary output with 92.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Army
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
33.6
Efficiency
92.5
Usage
52.8
Consistency
41
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 15. Temple: 11. Rice: 46. UTEP: 0. North Texas: 20. Wake Forest: 122. Air Force: 46. Notre Dame: 0. Unknown: 47. Navy: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 1 by 100. Temple: 1 by 73.3. Rice: 2 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 66.7. Wake Forest: 4 by 100. Air Force: 3 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Navy: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins37.2 · n=6 · +15.2 vs Losses
Losses22 · n=3 · -15.2 vs Wins
First Half18.4 · n=5 · -30.4 vs Second Half
Second Half48.8 · n=5 · +30.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | @ North Texas | W 38-31 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 12/10 | vs Navy | W 21-17 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Air Force | L 12-31 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Wake Forest100 receiving yards | W 21-13 | — | 4 | 122 | 30.5 | 30.50 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | L 18-35 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTEP | W 66-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Rice | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 31 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Temple | W 28-13 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 6 | 40 | 16.7 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 199 | 81.6 | 36.6 | 193 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 441 | 92.9 | 47.3 | 242 |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 336 | 92.5 | 52.8 | -105 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 336 | 92.5 | 52.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122
Primary metric
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Navy
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
100
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
95
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Penn State
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Army
441 primary output · 92.9 efficiency · 47.3 usage
68.1
#2
2016 Postseason · Army
65.3
336 primary · 92.5 efficiency · 52.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Army
65.3
336 primary · 92.5 efficiency · 52.8 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8311
Mission College Preparatory Catholic · San Luis Obispo, CA
- Committed To
- Nevada
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
982
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.