Usage / Role
58%
Regular defensive contributor
Player Dossier
2013-2016Army
LB • 6'0" • Queens Village, NY, USA
Andrew King shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.2 disruption score.
Usage / Role
58%
Regular defensive contributor
Impact Production
53
Solid production for a linebacker
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
43
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Player Story
Andrew King built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a linebacker from Queens Village, NY wearing No. 11, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Andrew King's career was his defensive production: 82...
Read the storyAndrew King, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Army. Andrew King shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.2 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 12 | 4 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 67.9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 12 | 78 | 9.5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 67.9 |
Related Context
Andrew King played LB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Andrew King recorded 82 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Army paired 16.5 primary output with 42.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Lafayette
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
42.2
Usage
14.2
Consistency
29.3
Best Game by takeover score
Lafayette
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 1. Temple: 0. Rice: 3. UTEP: 3. Buffalo: 1. Lafayette: 4. North Texas: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Air Force: 0. Notre Dame: 0.5. Morgan State: 3.5. Navy: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 4 by 26.7. Temple: 4 by 16.7. Rice: 7 by 59.2. UTEP: 5 by 50.8. Buffalo: 12 by 60. Lafayette: 5 by 60.8. North Texas: 8 by 33.3. Wake Forest: 4 by 16.7. Air Force: 11 by 45.8. Notre Dame: 10 by 46.7. Morgan State: 7 by 64.2. Navy: 5 by 25.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Lafayette
Best efficiency game
64.2 vs Morgan State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | @ North Texas | W 38-31 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/10 | vs Navy | W 21-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Morgan StateSplash game | W 60-3 | 7 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Notre Dame10+ tackles | L 6-44 | 10 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Air Force10+ tackles | L 12-31 | 11 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Wake Forest | W 21-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | L 18-35 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs LafayetteSplash game | W 62-7 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Buffalo10+ tackles | L 20-23 | 12 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTEPSplash game | W 66-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs RiceSplash game | W 31-14 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Temple | W 28-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Andrew King built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a linebacker from Queens Village, NY wearing No. 11, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Andrew King's career was his defensive production: 82 tackles, 9.5 tackles for loss, 4 sacks, and 1 pass defended across 12 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Army. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Andrew King's production has multiple signals. With 12 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Army.
The arc is straightforward: Andrew King moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 16.5 | 42.2 | 14.2 | 16.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 16.5 | 42.2 | 14.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Lafayette
Week 7 · W 62-7
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Havoc Plays
86.9 takeover
4 disruption/tackle impact with 86.9 takeover score.
#2
vs Morgan State
Week 12 · W 60-3
3.5
Havoc Plays
83.9 takeover
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 83.9 takeover score.
#3
vs Rice
Week 2 · W 31-14
3
Havoc Plays
78.1 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 78.1 takeover score.
#4
@ UTEP
Week 3 · W 66-14
3
Havoc Plays
75.3 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 75.3 takeover score.
#5
@ Buffalo
Week 4 · L 20-23
1
Havoc Plays
61.7 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Army
16.5 primary output · 42.2 efficiency · 14.2 usage
67.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
67.9
16.5 primary · 42.2 efficiency · 14.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
4
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.