Usage Score
13.7
Player Dossier
2013-2016Army
LB • 6'0" • Queens Village, NY, USA
Andrew King shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
13.7
Efficiency
40.6
Consistency
27.7
Season Value
25.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew King, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Army. Andrew King shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.6 disruption score.
Andrew King played LB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Andrew King recorded 82 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Army paired 14.5 primary output with 40.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
40.6
Usage
13.7
Consistency
27.7
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 0. Temple: 0. Rice: 3. UTEP: 2. Buffalo: 1. Unknown: 4. North Texas: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Air Force: 0. Notre Dame: 0.5. Unknown: 3.5. Navy: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 4 by 16.7. Temple: 4 by 16.7. Rice: 7 by 59.2. UTEP: 5 by 40.8. Buffalo: 12 by 60. Unknown: 5 by 60.8. North Texas: 8 by 33.3. Wake Forest: 4 by 16.7. Air Force: 11 by 45.8. Notre Dame: 10 by 46.7. Unknown: 7 by 64.2. Navy: 5 by 25.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
64.2 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | @ North Texas | W 38-31 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/10 | vs Navy | W 21-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 7 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Notre Dame10+ tackles | L 6-44 | 10 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Air Force10+ tackles | L 12-31 | 11 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Wake Forest | W 21-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | L 18-35 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Buffalo10+ tackles | L 20-23 | 12 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTEP | W 66-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs RiceSplash game | W 31-14 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Temple | W 28-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 14.5 | 40.6 | 13.7 | 14.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 14.5 | 40.6 | 13.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 62.2 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
3.5
Primary metric
Game with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.9 takeover score.
#3
Rice
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54 takeover score.
#4
UTEP
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.7 takeover score.
#5
Buffalo
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 33.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Army
14.5 primary output · 40.6 efficiency · 13.7 usage
25.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
25.1
14.5 primary · 40.6 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7533
Flushing · Flushing, NY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
82
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.