Usage / Role
100%
Featured defensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2016Army
LB • 6'1" • Tucson, AZ, USA
Jeremy Timpf shows a high-volume tackler profile with 48 disruption score.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured defensive role
Impact Production
100
Top-tier box-score impact for a linebacker
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
85
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Player Story
Jeremy Timpf built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a linebacker from Tucson, AZ wearing No. 39, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Jeremy Timpf's career was his defensive production: 97...
Read the storyJeremy Timpf, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Army. Jeremy Timpf shows a high-volume tackler profile with 48 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 1 | 45.4 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 1 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 41.8 |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 12 | 15 | 3 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 77.6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 12 | 82 | 9 | 1.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 77.6 |
Related Context
Jeremy Timpf played LB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jeremy Timpf recorded 97 tackles and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Army paired 18.5 primary output with 48 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 48 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
48
Usage
19.1
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 3. Temple: 0. Rice: 1. UTEP: 1.5. Buffalo: 1.5. Lafayette: 0. North Texas: 3. Wake Forest: 3. Air Force: 1. Notre Dame: 0.5. Morgan State: 2. Navy: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 15 by 80. Temple: 8 by 33.3. Rice: 6 by 35. UTEP: 2 by 23.3. Buffalo: 5 by 35.8. Lafayette: 3 by 12.5. North Texas: 12 by 80. Wake Forest: 9 by 67.5. Air Force: 12 by 60. Notre Dame: 6 by 30. Morgan State: 10 by 61.7. Navy: 9 by 57.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
80 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | @ North Texas10+ tackles · Splash game | W 38-31 | 15 | 12 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/10 | vs NavySplash game | W 21-17 | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Morgan State10+ tackles · Splash game | W 60-3 | 10 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-44 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Air Force10+ tackles | L 12-31 | 12 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Wake ForestSplash game | W 21-13 | 9 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas10+ tackles · Splash game | L 18-35 | 12 | 8 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Lafayette | W 62-7 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Buffalo | L 20-23 | 5 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTEP | W 66-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Rice | W 31-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Temple | W 28-13 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Jeremy Timpf built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a linebacker from Tucson, AZ wearing No. 39, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Jeremy Timpf's career was his defensive production: 97 tackles, 12 tackles for loss, 1.5 sacks, and 6 interceptions across 16 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Army. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Jeremy Timpf's production has multiple signals. With 16 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Army.
The arc is straightforward: Jeremy Timpf moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 20 | — | 3 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 1 | 20 | — | -2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 18.5 | 48 | 19.1 | 17.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 18.5 | 48 | 19.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ North Texas
Week 1 · W 38-31 · Postseason
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Havoc Plays
93.3 takeover
3 disruption/tackle impact with 93.3 takeover score.
#2
vs North Texas
Week 8 · L 18-35
3
Havoc Plays
93.3 takeover
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 93.3 takeover score.
#3
@ Wake Forest
Week 9 · W 21-13
3
Havoc Plays
89.2 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 89.2 takeover score.
#4
vs Morgan State
Week 12 · W 60-3
2
Havoc Plays
76.1 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 76.1 takeover score.
#5
vs Navy
Week 15 · W 21-17
2
Havoc Plays
74.7 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 74.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Army
18.5 primary output · 48 efficiency · 19.1 usage
77.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
77.6
18.5 primary · 48 efficiency · 19.1 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Army
45.4
3 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
11
Impact games
5
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.