Player Stats

Aaron Kemper College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
746
Rushing yards
746
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonArmy544440132.3
2014 Regular SeasonArmy81581580130.5
2015 Regular SeasonArmy115445440360.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Army paired 544 primary output with 50.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 50.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Loss with 129 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Army

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

49.5

Efficiency

50.9

Usage

16.9

Consistency

41.1

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Fordham: 36. UConn: 11. Wake Forest: 29. Eastern Michigan: 140. Penn State: 25. Duke: 14. Rice: 129. Air Force: 47. Tulane: 16. Rutgers: 59. Navy: 38

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fordham: 6 by 62.5. UConn: 4 by 28.6. Wake Forest: 11 by 27.5. Eastern Michigan: 12 by 98.6. Penn State: 4 by 65.1. Duke: 5 by 29.2. Rice: 14 by 88.4. Air Force: 14 by 35. Tulane: 13 by 12.8. Rutgers: 11 by 55.9. Navy: 7 by 56.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins140 · Games = 1 · +99.6 vs Losses
Losses40.4 · Games = 10 · -99.6 vs Wins