Usage Score
30.9
Player Dossier
2013-2016Tulsa
Keevan Lucas
WR • 5'10" • Abilene, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Keevan Lucas reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.5
Consistency
81.8
Season Value
72.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa
1314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keevan Lucas, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Tulsa. Keevan Lucas reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Tulsa paired 1,180 primary output with 87.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San José State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 76.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
90.8
Efficiency
87.5
Usage
30.9
Consistency
81.8
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 72. San José State: 112. Ohio State: 53. Unknown: 119. Fresno State: 111. SMU: 113. Houston: 88. Tulane: 67. Memphis: 91. East Carolina: 91. Navy: 75. UCF: 68. Cincinnati: 120
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 7 by 68.6. San José State: 6 by 100. Ohio State: 6 by 58.9. Unknown: 4 by 100. Fresno State: 8 by 92.5. SMU: 12 by 62.8. Houston: 5 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 100. Memphis: 9 by 67.4. East Carolina: 7 by 86.7. Navy: 2 by 100. UCF: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins93.9 · n=9 · +21.9 vs Losses
Losses72 · n=3 · -21.9 vs Wins
First Half95.4 · n=7 · +10.1 vs Second Half
Second Half85.3 · n=6 · -10.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
San José State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/19 | vs Central Michigan2+ TD | W 55-10 | — | 7 | 72 | 10.1 | 10.30 | 3 | 28 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | W 40-37 | — | 8 | 120 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 47 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCF | W 35-20 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Navy | L 40-42 | — | 2 | 75 | 26.3 | 37.50 | 1 | 74 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs East Carolina | W 45-24 | — | 7 | 91 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 40 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ MemphisHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 59-30 | — | 9 | 91 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Tulane | W 50-27 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Houston | L 31-38 | — | 5 | 88 | 15.2 | 17.60 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs SMU100 receiving yards · High volume | W 43-40 | — | 12 | 113 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Fresno State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-41 | — | 8 | 111 | 11.9 | 13.90 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 119 | 29.8 | 29.80 | 3 | 52 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State | L 3-48 | — | 6 | 53 | 6 | 8.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs San José State100 receiving yards | W 45-10 | — | 6 | 112 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 442 | 80.3 | 19.7 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1,219 | 77.7 | 37.1 | 777 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tulsa | 409 | 91 | 28.6 | -810 |
| 2016 Postseason | Tulsa | 1,180 | 87.5 | 30.9 | 771 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1,180 | 87.5 | 30.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
193
Primary metric
193 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulane
233
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
233 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San José State
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTEP
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Tulsa
1,180 primary output · 87.5 efficiency · 30.9 usage
72.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tulsa
72.8
1,180 primary · 87.5 efficiency · 30.9 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Tulsa
70.1
1,219 primary · 77.7 efficiency · 37.1 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8194
Abilene · Abilene, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,250
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.