Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Utah State paired 1,479 primary output with 53.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Postseason | Utah State | 8 | 115 | 121 | -6 | 1 | 62.4 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah State | 8 | 1,364 | 1,325 | 39 | 9 | 62.4 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah State | 5 | 1,144 | 1,140 | 4 | 10 | 60.3 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oregon State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oregon State | 6 | 791 | 617 | 174 | 6 | 51.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oregon State | 10 | 1,517 | 1,465 | 52 | 9 | 61.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Utah State paired 1,479 primary output with 53.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah State, Oregon State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
151.7
Efficiency
55.3
Usage
12.6
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Portland State: 29. Washington State: 35. Washington: 75. USC: 184. Colorado: 302. Stanford: 115. California: 186. Arizona: 197. Arizona State: 283. Oregon: 111
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Portland State: 6 by 48.3. Washington State: 5 by 83.3. Washington: 23 by 47. USC: 34 by 49.5. Colorado: 39 by 68.3. Stanford: 26 by 48.2. California: 30 by 60.6. Arizona: 34 by 51.3. Arizona State: 47 by 55.8. Oregon: 21 by 40.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.