Usage Score
13.4
Player Dossier
2013-2017Ohio
LB • 6'0" • 235 lbs • Gomer, OH, USA
Quentin Poling shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 49 disruption score.
Usage Score
13.4
Efficiency
49
Consistency
36.7
Season Value
30.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quentin Poling, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Ohio. Quentin Poling shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 49 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Ohio paired 3 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 49 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
49
Usage
13.4
Consistency
36.7
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 0. Unknown: 1. Purdue: 1. Kansas: 2. Eastern Michigan: 2. Massachusetts: 0.5. Central Michigan: 0. Bowling Green: 4. Kent State: 1. Miami (OH): 1.5. Toledo: 6. Akron: 1. Buffalo: 3
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 5 by 20.8. Unknown: 6 by 35. Purdue: 2 by 18.3. Kansas: 10 by 61.7. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 53.3. Massachusetts: 19 by 55. Central Michigan: 8 by 33.3. Bowling Green: 10 by 81.7. Kent State: 7 by 39.2. Miami (OH): 10 by 56.7. Toledo: 12 by 100. Akron: 7 by 39.2. Buffalo: 3 by 42.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/22 | vs UAB | W 41-6 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Buffalo | L 24-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Wed 11/15 | @ Akron | L 34-37 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | vs Toledo10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | W 38-10 | 12 | 5 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/1 | vs Miami (OH)10+ tackles | W 45-28 | 10 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Kent State | W 48-3 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Bowling Green10+ tackles · Splash game | W 48-30 | 10 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Central Michigan | L 23-26 | 8 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Massachusetts10+ tackles | W 58-50 | 19 | 9 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 27-20 | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Kansas10+ tackles | W 42-30 | 10 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Purdue | L 21-44 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 3 | 60 | — | 3 |
| 2015 Postseason | Ohio | 4 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 4 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio | 21.5 | 47.2 | 10.8 | 17.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 21.5 | 47.2 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio | 23 | 49 | 13.4 | 1.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio | 23 | 49 | 13.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Idaho
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 80 takeover score.
#2
Toledo
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 79.7 takeover score.
#3
Bowling Green
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 64.2 takeover score.
#4
Texas State
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.3 takeover score.
#5
App State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Ohio
3 primary output · 60 efficiency · — usage
54.3
#2
2015 Postseason · Ohio
41.3
4 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Ohio
41.3
4 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
8
Impact games
7
Splash games
7
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7633
Elida · Lima, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
216
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Quentin Poling quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit